Share Awake Nations

Leave a comment

Get more from Glenn Bleakney in the Substack app

Available for iOS and Android

Get the app

There is a question being asked in the church today with a frequency that should trouble us, not because the question is illegitimate, but because the conditions producing it have multiplied; and the question is this: when a leader falls, can he be restored to ministry?

In recent months alone we have watched the public unraveling of names once spoken with reverence. We have watched a Texas megachurch founder plead guilty to the sexual abuse of a child, the abuse having begun, by the victim’s account, when she was twelve years old. We have watched another Dallas pastor of long and honored standing step away over an undisclosed “moral failure,” submit to a year-long process, and be welcomed back to a standing ovation on a Sunday his church billed as “Restoration Sunday.” And around these high-profile cases hover a hundred quieter ones; the affairs, the financial deceptions, the abuses of power and authority that never reach the headlines yet devastate congregations all the same.

The frequency of the question is, as one observer has noted, sadly tied to the frequency of the failures. So the church reaches reflexively for a single text, “you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness” (Galatians 6:1), and treats it as a clearance, a green light, a divine mandate to return the fallen to the platform. But this is to read the verse without reading the church, and to confuse two things Scripture never confuses.

I want to make a distinction in this article that I believe the contemporary church has almost entirely collapsed, and the collapse is costing us our credibility before a watching world.

Restoration is not reinstatement.

They are not synonyms. They are not even necessarily sequential.

One is the inheritance of every repentant believer; the other is a stewardship the church may, or may not, choose to extend. To treat the first as automatically producing the second is to misunderstand both.

WHAT RESTORATION ACTUALLY IS

Restoration, in the biblical sense, concerns the soul of the sinner before God. It is about healing, repentance, redemption, and the work of helping someone be made whole again in Christ. It is the recovery of fellowship, the healing of the inner man, the renewal of communion that sin had ruptured. When David cried, “Restore to me the joy of your salvation” (Psalm 51:12), he was not petitioning for the throne, which he already held; he was petitioning for the joy, for the nearness, for the clean heart and the right spirit that his adultery and his orchestrated murder had driven from him. Restoration is what God does in a person who turns; it is gift, it is grace, it is the unfailing inheritance of all who genuinely repent.

And here is the glorious truth we must never minimize in our zeal to protect the flock: everyrepentant sinner can be restored. The thief on the cross was restored. Peter, who denied his Lord three times with curses, was restored. There is no failure so grievous that the blood of Christ cannot cleanse it and no fall so deep that grace cannot reach the bottom of it. When a fallen leader weeps over his sin, when he submits himself to discipline, when he bears the fruit of repentance; that man can be fully, completely, eternally restored to his God. We must say this loudly, because a church that doubts the sufficiency of grace has lost the gospel itself.

But notice what restoration is: it is the reconciliation of a person to God and, in measure, to the community he wounded. It is not the return of that person to an office.

WHAT REINSTATEMENT ACTUALLY IS

Reinstatement concerns something entirely different. It concerns the stewardship of office before the people of God. Reinstatement is about returning someone to a previous position of leadership, influence, or responsibility, and that return requires the rebuilding of trust with those impacted, with those they would lead, and with those responsible for oversight and accountability; it requires the demonstrated fruit of repentance that reflects godly character, wisdom, and accountability. The pastorate, the eldership, the recognized place of teaching authority; these are not personal possessions to be repossessed upon repentance; they are trusts held on behalf of a congregation, governed by qualifications that Scripture sets out with deliberate weight.

Consider the qualifications themselves. An overseer must be “above reproach,” anepīlēmptos, literally one who cannot be taken hold of, against whom no handle for accusation exists; he must be “well thought of by outsiders” (1 Timothy 3:2, 3:7). These are not interior conditions, recoverable in the secret place between a man and his God. They are public, observable, relational realities; and they are precisely the realities that a moral failure destroys. A man may be genuinely restored in his soul and still, for a season or for the remainder of his life, fail to meet the standard of being above reproach in the eyes of the very people he is asked to lead.

This is why the distinction matters so urgently. The question, “Has this man repented?” and the question, “Should this man hold office again?” are two different questions, requiring two different examinations, answerable by two different criteria. The first is answered by the fruit of his repentance. The second is answered by whether the disqualification his sin produced has, in fact, been removed; and some disqualifications, by their nature, are not removable on a timetable, while some may not be removable at all.

THE ERROR OF THE COLLAPSED DISTINCTION

What I am describing as the collapse is this: the church increasingly treats the completion of a restoration process as if it automatically discharged the question of reinstatement to office. We design a program of counseling, a season away, accountability partners, and a public statement of repentance; and when the program is complete we conclude that the man is therefore qualified to lead again. The process becomes a kind of penance that, once served, restores not merely the soul but the office.

But repentance, however genuine, does not by itself re-establish the public trust that office requires. A man may complete every step of a restoration process with total sincerity and emerge genuinely restored to God; and yet the question of whether he should stand again before a congregation remains entirely open, to be settled not by whether he has suffered enough or wept enough, but by whether the qualifications themselves have been re-established. We should observe, with some sobriety, that in at least one of the recent high-profile cases the elders affirmed the man’s restoration while declining to return him to leadership; and that this distinction, far from being a cruelty, was an act of theological clarity that more churches would do well to imitate.

WHAT RESTORATION MUST INVOLVE BEFORE REINSTATEMENT IS EVEN A QUESTION

If, then, reinstatement is ever to be considered, what must the restorative process actually contain? Not as a checklist to be hurried through, but as the slow re-establishment of what sin tore down. I would name the following:

1. Genuine repentance, not mere disclosure under pressure. There is a vast difference between the sorrow of being caught and the godly grief that produces repentance leading to salvation (2 Corinthians 7:10). The first manages a crisis; the second hates the sin. The church must discern which it is looking at, and it cannot discern this quickly.

2. Full ownership without minimization. The fallen leader must name what he did without the softening euphemisms; and here the church should be wary, for the very phrase “moral failure” has become a fog through which abusers conceal the specifics of what was, in some cases, a crime against a child. Where there has been a crime, restoration of the soul is one matter; the demands of justice, the protection of victims, and the reporting obligations to civil authority are not suspended by the church’s grace, nor may they ever be.

3. Submission to authority the leader does not control. A restoration overseen by the fallen man’s own loyalists, on terms he himself sets, is no restoration at all. The process must be governed by those with the standing and the will to say no.

4. Restitution and the centering of the wounded. The flock he injured, the spouse he betrayed, the victim he harmed; their healing, not his return to relevance, must be the gravitational center of the process. A restoration organized around getting the leader back on the platform has already revealed that it serves the leader and not the wounded.

5. Time sufficient to test the fruit.Repentance is proved not by its declaration but by its endurance. A season measured in weeks, or even in a single year, may be adequate to begin healing the soul; it is rarely adequate to re-establish a reputation that is “above reproach” and “well thought of by outsiders.”

6. A sober reckoning with the nature of the disqualification. Some failures, by their character, permanently bar a man from a particular office while leaving him fully restored as a beloved son of God serving in other ways. The shepherd who has preyed on the sheep does not get the staff back because he has wept. To say so is not to deny grace; it is to honor the flock.

Share

THE PASTORAL CONCLUSION

So let us hold both truths with their full weight, refusing to surrender either. Grace is real, and grace is total; there is no fallen leader beyond the reach of the cross, and the church that withholds the hope of restoration from a repentant brother has failed the gospel. And office is a trust, not a right; there is no automatic pathway from “I have repented” to “I will lead again,” and the church that hands back the pulpit as though repentance were the only qualification has failed the flock.

We should always pursue restoration. But reinstatement must be approached with wisdom, because grace offers forgiveness, yet grace does not remove the need for stewardship, for consequences, and for the patient rebuilding of trust. To forgive a man is one thing, and the gospel commands it; to return a man to authority is another thing entirely, and the gospel nowhere commands it. The first flows freely from grace received. The second flows only from trust rebuilt and qualifications re-established.

Restoration we owe to every penitent, because God owes it through His covenant of grace. Reinstatement we owe to no one, because it was never a debt; it was always a stewardship. The fallen shepherd may be wholly restored to the Father’s house and never again hold the staff; and if that seems to us a hard saying, it is only because we have so prized the platform that we have forgotten the sheep were always the point.

If this article served you, consider subscribing to Awake Nations for ongoing theological reflection on the Kingdom, the church, and the formation of disciples.

Message me

Sign up for my teaching newsletter at AwakeNations.org

Share

One of the most common phrases heard today is, “I’m not into church anymore; I’m focused on the Kingdom.”

At first glance it sounds spiritual, mature, and discerning, as though the speaker has moved beyond religious structures into the larger purposes of God. Yet often that statement is not a revelation but a rationalization.

The Kingdom and the Church are not competitors. Jesus never presented them as opposing realities; on the contrary, the King established His Church as the primary expression of His Kingdom in the earth. Many who have been hurt, offended, or disillusioned with church life have nevertheless adopted Kingdom language to justify their separation from the very community Christ died to build. It becomes a disguise, a spiritual-sounding cover for independence.

THE KINGDOM IS BIGGER THAN THE CHURCH

Let us be clear: the Kingdom of God is indeed bigger than the local church. The Kingdom encompasses God’s rule, reign, authority, and redemptive purposes in every sphere of life, touching families, businesses, governments, education, media, and culture. The Church is not the sum of the Kingdom, nor can the Kingdom be confined to any single congregation or institution.

But neither can the Kingdom be properly expressed apart from the Church. The Church is the King’s embassy in the earth, His covenant community, His body, His bride, and His household. To claim allegiance to the King while rejecting His family is a contradiction the New Testament will not permit.

While the Kingdom reaches far beyond the gathered Church into every arena of human life, the Church remains its most visible and intentional expression. It is the community where citizens of the Kingdom are formed, discipled, equipped, and sent. The Kingdom is larger than the Church, but the Church is not optional to the Kingdom. Jesus never envisioned a Kingdom movement detached from a covenant people. Those who attempt to embrace the Kingdom while distancing themselves from the Church often create a division that Scripture never makes.

The Rise of Spiritual Independence

We live in an age that celebrates autonomy, and that spirit has crept into the household of faith. People want Jesus without accountability, mission without submission, purpose without people, and calling without community. Many who say they are pursuing the Kingdom have simply exchanged one form of religion for another, namely the religion of self-rule, in which spirituality becomes self-directed and self-defined.

No pastors, no elders, no correction, no commitment, no covenant relationships; just “me, Jesus, and my assignment.” But the New Testament knows nothing of isolated believers disconnected from the life of the Church, for the very metaphors Scripture uses, body, household, flock, temple, family, are corporate by nature and meaningless in isolation.

Wounded People Often Create Theologies That Justify Their Wounds

Let us be honest. Some people have been deeply hurt by church leaders, having experienced manipulation, control, hypocrisy, or even abuse, and those wounds are real and should never be minimized. But healing does not come through abandoning the design of God.

Too often disappointment hardens into doctrine, pain calcifies into philosophy, and offense ossifies into theology. Instead of processing their hurt and pursuing restoration, people construct a narrative that says they no longer need the Church because they have discovered the Kingdom. What they have actually discovered is a way to avoid ever being vulnerable again.

Jesus Is Building His Church

Jesus did not say, “I will build My Kingdom,” for the Kingdom is the eternal reign of God, established before the foundation of the world. He said instead, “I will build My church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it” (Matthew 16:18). The Church remains His ongoing project, and He builds it despite its flaws, despite its weaknesses, and despite imperfect leaders and imperfect people.

The Church is still the chosen instrument of God for discipleship, fellowship, worship, mission, and spiritual formation. Those who love the King will love what the King loves.

Kingdom and Church Belong Together

The healthiest believers understand that Kingdom and Church are not enemies but partners in the purposes of God. The Church gathers believers for worship, discipleship, and community, while the Kingdom sends those same believers into the world as ambassadors of Christ. The Church is where we are formed; the Kingdom is where we are deployed. The Church is family; the Kingdom is assignment. The Church nurtures our identity; the Kingdom advances our influence. The believer is not asked to choose between them, for he needs both.

A Call Back to Covenant

Perhaps the issue is not that you have outgrown the Church but that you have been wounded by it. Perhaps what you need is not distance but healing, not independence but restoration, not isolation but covenant. The answer to unhealthy churches is not the abandonment of the Church; it is the pursuit of healthy expressions of the Church that reflect the heart of the King.

The Kingdom of God is advancing throughout the earth, and it will not be stopped. But make no mistake: the King still loves His Church, and those who truly embrace the Kingdom will never use it as an excuse to reject what Jesus is building.

Formed for the Kingdom, Sent for the King

If this stirs something in you, the answer is not isolation but formation. The believer who longs to advance the Kingdom must first be discipled, equipped, and sent through covenant community, and this is precisely the work of Sent College.

Sent College exists to form men and women for Kingdom ministry, joining rigorous theological training to the life of the local church. We offer a full pathway of study to meet you wherever you stand: the Associate Degree of Ministry, the Bachelor of Ministry, the Bachelor of Theology, and the Master of Divinity. For those who wish to learn without pursuing a full credential, you may also enroll as an audit student and study entirely through our video option, engaging the same teaching at your own pace and from anywhere in the earth.

The Kingdom is advancing, and the King is still building His Church. He is looking for those who will be formed before they are sent. If you are ready to be equipped for that calling, take the next step.

Enroll today, or write to us at support@sentcollege.com to learn more.

This is the age of the floating saint, and it is producing a generation of spiritually malnourished believers who mistake mobility for maturity.

What Scripture Actually Says About Belonging

The New Testament knows nothing of the detached believer. The word ekklesia, which we translate “church,” carries within it the very idea of a called-out, gathered, identifiable assembly. When Paul wrote his epistles, he wrote them to specific congregations in specific cities with specific elders and specific members. “To the church of God which is at Corinth” (1 Corinthians 1:2). “To the saints who are in Ephesus” (Ephesians 1:1). There was no ambiguity about where one belonged.

Hebrews 13:17 carries weight that the modern church has largely forgotten: “Obey those who rule over you, and be submissive, for they watch out for your souls, as those who must give account.” This verse presupposes that every believer has spiritual leaders who know them, who shepherd them, and who will answer to God for them. The floating saint has rendered this verse inoperable in their own life. No shepherd can give an account for sheep he does not know.

Paul’s metaphor of the body in 1 Corinthians 12 likewise demands locality. A hand cannot float between bodies; an eye cannot rotate between heads. The very notion is grotesque, yet we have normalised it spiritually. The Apostle is emphatic: “God has set the members, each one of them, in the body just as He pleased” (1 Corinthians 12:18). Set. Planted. Positioned. Not drifting.

Why the Drifting Happens

Honesty requires that we acknowledge the legitimate wounds that produce floaters. Some have been hurt by domineering leadership; some have endured doctrinal abuse; some have suffered the slow disillusionment of watching the institution they loved drift from the Gospel. These are real injuries and they deserve compassion, not condemnation.

But there is another category, and we must name it plainly. Many float because commitment costs and consumption is cheap. They float because being known is uncomfortable and anonymity is convenient. They float because submitting to leadership requires the death of self-will and the floating saint has not yet died to self. They float because the moment correction comes, they leave; the moment offence arises, they relocate; the moment the worship style changes, they shop elsewhere. This is not freedom; it is bondage to preference.

The Platform-Seekers

There is yet another category of floater that must be named, for it is perhaps the most dangerous of all. These are not the wounded and they are not merely the uncommitted. These are those who move from house to house seeking a platform, a microphone, a stage, a title, a recognition, all the while refusing the very thing that makes ministry legitimate before God: submission to spiritual fathers and the long journey of formation.

They will appear at a congregation with their gifting on display, eager to be seen, eager to be used, eager to be promoted. But the moment leadership begins to disciple them, the moment correction enters the relationship, the moment they are asked to serve hiddenly before they are released publicly, they vanish. They reappear at the next congregation with the same pattern. They are looking for the reward of ministry without the road of ministry. They want the throne without the wilderness, the platform without Patmos, the anointing without the alabaster box broken at the feet of Jesus.

Scripture is unsparing on this. Jesus Himself submitted to thirty hidden years before three public ones. David served Saul, tended sheep, hid in caves, and refused to seize the kingdom by his own hand even when opportunity presented itself. Elisha poured water on the hands of Elijah before he ever inherited the mantle. Timothy was proven before he was sent. Paul went to Arabia, then to Tarsus, then waited until Barnabas fetched him, before his apostolic ministry was publicly recognised. The pattern is unbroken throughout the Scriptures: hiddenness before honour, sonship before sending, submission before stewardship.

The platform-seeker has inverted this divine order. He wants the fruit without the root, the harvest without the ploughing, the crown without the cross. And because no local house will give him what he has not yet earned through the journey of formation, he floats, perpetually searching for the leader naive enough or desperate enough to hand him a stage. What he is actually doing is fleeing the very process that would qualify him for the ministry he covets.

Hear this clearly. A ministry that bypasses spiritual fathering is not a ministry the Holy Spirit has endorsed. Gifting without character is a bomb with a lit fuse. The Lord is not in a hurry, and those who are in a hurry to be seen are seldom those whom the Lord is preparing to use deeply. The floater who refuses the journey is not actually preparing for ministry; he is disqualifying himself from it.

What Right Looks Like

The biblical pattern is planting, not floating. Psalm 92:13 declares, “Those who are planted in the house of the Lord shall flourish in the courts of our God.” Notice the connection: flourishing follows planting. Roots produce fruit. The believer who never sinks roots into a local expression of the Body will never produce the depth of Christlike fruit that planting yields.

Right looks like this: you find a congregation where Christ is preached, where the Word is honoured, where the Spirit moves, and where godly leadership shepherds the flock. You commit. You join. You serve. You give. You submit. You stay through the difficult seasons because difficulty is the very forge in which Christlike character is formed. You let yourself be known and you let yourself be corrected. You contribute your gift to the body rather than withholding it until you find the perfect community, which does not exist.

For those who have been genuinely wounded, the path forward is healing within a healthy expression of the Body, not perpetual flight from every expression of it. Isolation will not heal what only the Body can heal. For those seeking a platform, the path forward is the death of ambition and the embrace of the hidden years. Lay down the microphone. Pick up the towel. Find a father. Submit. Serve. Wait. The Lord exalts in due season those who first humble themselves under His mighty hand.

Subscribe

The Apostolic Call

The hour demands that we recover the New Testament vision of the local church. Not the consumer-oriented service-attendance model that has too often masqueraded as church, but the apostolic ekklesia: a covenant community of disciples under shepherding leadership, contending together for the Kingdom in a specific place.

If you are floating, hear this as an invitation rather than an indictment. Find your house. Sink your roots. Submit to leadership. Bear fruit where you are planted. The Body needs you, and you need the Body. The Kingdom advances through committed congregations, not through clouds of unattached spectators, and certainly not through self-appointed ministers who have never knelt at a father’s feet.

Stop floating. Get planted. Then watch what God does.

Are You Ready for the Journey of Formation?

If this article has stirred you, and you sense the call of God to be formed rather than merely featured, Sent College exists for you. We are not a platform; we are a forge. We are not a stage; we are a school of sons and daughters. Our curriculum is built around the apostolic patterns of Scripture, where character precedes calling, where sonship precedes sending, and where the hidden years produce the public fruit.

Sent College offers theological training across five pathways — Certificate of Ministry, Associate of Ministry, Bachelor of Ministry, Bachelor of Theology, and Master of Divinity — taught by seasoned ministers committed to walking with you, not waving you past. If you are tired of floating and ready to be planted; if you are tired of platforms and ready for formation; if you are tired of self-appointment and ready for spiritual fathering, then the door is open.

Interested in Sent College? Email us at support@sentcollege.com and begin the journey that produces ministry the Holy Spirit endorses.

Message me

Get the app

Share

The recovery of genuine apostolic authority is not a power grab. It is a rescue operation.

Where authority has been abused, the wounded have scattered. Where it has been abdicated, the directionless have drifted. The hour demands something rarer than either extreme: leaders who carry genuine governmental weight and wield it entirely in the posture of a servant; men and women who understand that the measure of their authority is not the size of what they govern, but the maturity of what they release.

A Word Before We Begin

Welcome to Edition 5 of our seven-part series on apostolic transition.

In Edition 1, we examined the foundational shift from pastoral maintenance to Kingdom pioneering, the recognition that the Church was never designed to be a holding facility but a launching pad. In Edition 2, we recovered the Gospel of the Kingdom itself, confronting the sobering reality that much of what passes for “the gospel” in contemporary Christianity is a truncated message that produces truncated disciples. In Edition 3, we turned that message into mission, examining the shift from attendance to disciple-making nations, and confronting the most deeply embedded assumption of the modern church: that success is measured by how many people show up rather than how many people are sent out. In Edition 4, we addressed the apostolic architecture that makes exponential multiplication possible, the structures, leadership frameworks, and cultural scaffolding through which addition gives way to something the New Testament simply calls movement.

Now in Edition 5 we press into the question that undergirds everything we have examined thus far: Who leads this?

Foundations require builders. A message requires messengers. Mission requires those with genuine sending authority. Multiplication requires a governmental structure capable of coordinating exponential advance without collapsing under the weight of its own expansion. The question of apostolic authority is not peripheral to the apostolic transition; it is the axle upon which every other wheel turns. And it is the question the Western Church has handled with the least theological clarity and the most lasting damage.

The Question Every Leader Must Answer

Before a community can embrace apostolic authority, it must reckon honestly with its own history of authority. That history, for the majority of Western believers in the early decades of the twenty-first century, is not neutral. It has been shaped by decades of high-profile leadership collapse, by the documented abuse of spiritual power in charismatic and institutional settings alike, and by the quieter but equally damaging experience of ministry environments so hierarchical in their structure and so resistant to accountability that those within them learned to equate authority with control and submission with silence.

The wounds are real. The disillusionment is understandable.

And any recovery of genuine apostolic governmental understanding that does not begin by acknowledging this landscape honestly is a recovery that will not last, because it will be speaking into a room full of people whose nervous systems have already learned to associate the language of apostolic authority with experiences they have spent years trying to survive.

This, then, is where Edition 5 must begin: not with a defence of authority but with an honest naming of what authority has so frequently become, and a willingness to ask, with theological seriousness and pastoral care, what the New Testament actually describes when it describes the governmental life of an apostolic community.

The Two Perpetual Failures

Every generation of the Church inherits two temptations regarding authority, and the contemporary Western church has managed to embody both simultaneously in different quarters.

The first is abuse: the concentration of spiritual authority in the hands of individuals who exercise it without accountability, without transparency, and without the covenantal submission to peers and to Scripture that the New Testament requires of every leader regardless of gifting or office. The charismatic and apostolic streams have been particularly susceptible to this failure. Its consequences, shattered congregations, spiritually manipulated individuals, the wholesale disillusionment of entire generations with institutional Christianity, are extensively and painfully documented.

Where authority is abused, the wounded do not merely leave the leader. They leave the church. And frequently, with a grief that is difficult to overstate, they leave the faith.

The second failure is abdication: the overreaction to abuse that produces ministry environments with virtually no governmental structure, no recognised authority, and no capacity for genuine apostolic direction. This failure is no less damaging than the first, though it wounds more quietly and more slowly. A community without genuine governmental grounding is not safer than one with abusive authority; it is simply differently endangered. It drifts. It fragments. It loses its capacity for coordinated advance.

It mistakes the absence of leadership for the presence of freedom, when in reality the vacuum created by abdicated authority is always filled by something: the loudest voice, the most anxious faction, the largest donor, or simply the slow gravitational pull of entropy.

The recovery of genuine apostolic authority requires the rejection of both failures, not the selection of one over the other, but the construction of something categorically different from either; namely, the governmental pattern the New Testament actually describes.

What the New Testament Actually Says

The New Testament’s most concentrated and consequential treatment of apostolic authority appears in Ephesians 4:11–13, a passage so foundational to a genuinely biblical governmental understanding that it warrants careful and unhurried attention.

“And he gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the shepherds and teachers, to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ, until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ.” — Ephesians 4:11–13 (ESV)

Three elements of this passage demand particular attention, because each one subverts the distorted models of authority that have done so much damage.

First, the gifts are given by Christ, not assumed by the gifted. The apostle, prophet, evangelist, shepherd, and teacher do not appoint themselves. They are given, edōken, the aorist of didōmi, a completed act of divine bestowal. This is not the language of institutional appointment or personal ambition. It is the language of grace. Those who carry genuine fivefold governmental grace carry something they did not generate and cannot sustain by their own effort; they carry a gift entrusted to them for the sake of others, accountable to the One who gave it.

Second, the purpose of these gifts is equipping, katartismos in the Greek, a term drawn from both medical and nautical usage in the first century. In medicine, katartismos described the setting of a broken bone or the restoration of a dislocated joint: the return of a member to its proper place and full function within the body. In the nautical world, it described the fitting-out of a ship with everything necessary for the voyage it was built to undertake. Neither usage carries any connotation of control. Both carry the connotation of restoration to full capacity.

The authority of the fivefold gifts exists not to manage the saints but to restore them to the full ministerial functioning for which they were created. Every exercise of apostolic authority that does not produce this outcome has departed, however sincerely, from its own mandate.

Third, the telos, the goal toward which all of this governmental activity is oriented, is “the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ.” This is an ambition of breathtaking scope. The endpoint of apostolic authority is not an efficiently managed community or a numerically impressive congregation. It is the full-orbed corporate reproduction of Christ himself in and through his people. Every governance structure, every leadership appointment, every exercise of spiritual government that is not consciously oriented toward this end has settled for something far smaller than the New Testament envisions.

Read more

Every Gospel Introduces Jesus With Fire. We Replaced It With Programmes.

There is a question that ought to unsettle every honest reader of the New Testament, and it is this: if you were to ask a thousand Christians to summarise, in a single sentence, the mission of Jesus, how many would answer with the words the Gospels themselves use to introduce Him? The answer would be very few; perhaps almost none. We have been catechised to speak of the cross, the empty tomb, the forgiveness of sins, the gift of eternal life; and each of these glories is real, biblical, and beyond price. Yet none of them is the answer the four evangelists give when they first place Jesus in front of us. The first thing each Gospel says about His mission is something else entirely, and it is something the contemporary church has quietly, almost unconsciously, allowed to slip out of its central proclamation.

Matthew, Mark, Luke and John all introduce Jesus through the witness of one man, John the Baptist; and that witness, in every account, converges on a single, identifying phrase. “I baptize you with water for repentance, but he who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire” (Matt. 3:11). Mark records the same testimony (Mark 1:8); Luke records it almost word for word (Luke 3:16); and John, who arranges his Gospel around theological signs rather than chronological order, still preserves the Baptist’s confession as a foundational identifier: “He who sent me to baptize with water said to me, ‘He on whom you see the Spirit descend and remain, this is he who baptizes with the Holy Spirit’” (John 1:33). Four accounts, four authors, four different audiences, one unbroken introduction. The Spirit-and-fire baptism is not a peripheral feature of Christ’s ministry; it is the headline, the banner, the inaugural definition. To miss it is to misread the opening page.

A Mission We Have Tamed

Why, then, does this proclamation occupy so small a place in modern preaching? Part of the answer is cultural; part is theological; and part, we must confess, is institutional. The modern Western church, formed in the wake of the Enlightenment and the long shadow of revivalist excess, has grown comfortable with a Christianity it can manage. Doctrines that can be systematised, sermons that can be outlined, programmes that can be scheduled; these we know how to handle. But a Christ who baptises in fire is a Christ who refuses domestication. The Greek verb baptizō means to immerse, to plunge, to submerge entirely; it is not the language of a polite religious ceremony. To be baptised in the Holy Spirit and fire is to be submerged in a presence that reorders the personality, reorganises the will, and refuses to leave the believer’s interior architecture in the shape it found it.

Furthermore, secular scepticism has not retreated; it has hardened. The cultural moment in which we now minister is one of intense spiritual exhaustion. Traditional religious routines carry very little weight; passive church attendance has become unintelligible to those outside its walls; and the gospel, when reduced to theory, is dismissed as one ideology among many. Modern audiences are not impressed by religious vocabulary, however well rehearsed. They are looking, however unconsciously, for something tangible, something demonstrable, something that the natural eye cannot easily explain away. Paul understood this when he wrote, “My speech and my message were not in plausible words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power, so that your faith might not rest in the wisdom of men but in the power of God” (1 Cor. 2:4–5). The mission Jesus declared is precisely the mission the present hour requires; and yet it is the mission we have most thoroughly muted.

Fire Unharnessed and Fire Channelled

Fire, when left to itself, is a chaotic force. We see this every Australian summer when wildfires devour grasslands, homes and bushland with terrifying indifference. Yet the same element, channelled and contained, becomes the engine of civilisation. Once harnessed, fire performs four distinct functions; it generates power, it produces light, it provides heat, and it purifies precious metals. Each of these natural outputs answers to a spiritual reality that the baptism of the Holy Spirit produces in the believer. The Spirit and fire that Christ promises are not metaphors for vague religious enthusiasm; they describe a specific transformation that releases four identifiable dimensions in the life of His witness. The remainder of this article will trace each one in turn.

The First Dimension: Power

The Greek word the New Testament uses for spiritual power is dunamis, from which we derive the English words “dynamic” and “dynamite”. In an internal combustion engine, raw combustion is converted into explosive energy, and that explosion is then harnessed into downward force and forward momentum. The parallel is exact. “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth” (Acts 1:8). Jesus did not commission His disciples to attempt witness in their own strength; He explicitly forbade it. “Behold, I am sending the promise of my Father upon you. But stay in the city until you are clothed with power from on high” (Luke 24:49). The verb endusēsthe, “clothed”, carries the sense of being arrayed in something that envelops the whole person; it is the same word used elsewhere for putting on a garment. Until the disciples were so clothed, they were not yet ready to be sent.

When the early church proclaimed the gospel, this dunamis followed; the lame walked, the demonised were delivered, the dead were raised. These signs were not optional accessories to apostolic preaching; they were the physical validation that the kingdom announced was real, present and operative. Philip went down to Samaria and proclaimed the Christ to them; “and the crowds with one accord paid attention to what was being said by Philip, when they heard him and saw the signs that he did” (Acts 8:6). The hearing and the seeing belonged together; the proclamation and the demonstration moved as one. In a culture exhausted by religious theory, the recovery of this dimension is not a luxury. It is the spiritual combustion that gives witness its forward momentum.

The Second Dimension: Perception

Raw power, however, is catastrophic without direction. An engine without headlights at midnight is not an asset but a liability. The second dimension that the Spirit produces is perception, the spiritual capacity to see what cannot be seen by the natural eye. “The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned” (1 Cor. 2:14). Discernment is not cleverness; it is illumination. The Spirit acts as light, exposing what is hidden, identifying what is counterfeit, distinguishing between voices that sound similar but originate in different realms.

This dimension has never been more urgently needed than now. We live in an hour saturated with counterfeit spirituality; deceiving spirits, Paul warned Timothy, will increase in the latter times, accompanied by teachings that bear an outward form of godliness but deny its power (1 Tim. 4:1; 2 Tim. 3:5). A deceiving spirit can masquerade as a righteous leader; it can quote Scripture, deploy theological vocabulary, and present a public face that is, to the natural assessment, entirely respectable. Without divine illumination, the believer is left to navigate this landscape by sentiment, intuition or institutional reputation, none of which is reliable. The Holy Spirit, by contrast, provides what Paul called “the eyes of your hearts enlightened” (Eph. 1:18). Such eyes pierce through facades; they see motives the natural mind cannot detect; they recognise the kingdom in unlikely vessels and detect compromise in venerated platforms. Momentum is useless if you are driving toward a cliff; the witness who carries power without perception will, in the end, expend that power on the wrong targets.

Leave a comment

The Third Dimension: Passion

The third dimension is passion, and its natural correlate is heat. A machine may possess every mechanical component in perfect order, yet if the fire goes out the entire system grows cold and stationary. The early church understood this; the Romans were exhorted to be “fervent in spirit” (Rom. 12:11), where the Greek zeontes means literally “boiling”, a temperature image drawn from a pot at full heat. Spiritual fervour is not emotional theatre; it is sustained interior combustion that drives the believer’s service even when circumstances would extinguish lesser fires.

The historical church in Ephesus stands as the primary warning here. They had flawless doctrine; they had tested those who claimed to be apostles and found them false; they had laboured tirelessly without growing weary. Yet the risen Christ, who walked among the lampstands, delivered to them one of the most searching indictments in the New Testament: “But I have this against you, that you have abandoned the love you had at first” (Rev. 2:4). Mechanics without heat eventually degrade into dead religion; orthodoxy without zeal becomes a museum of correct ideas. The Lord’s prescription to Ephesus was not a refinement of their doctrine but the rekindling of their first love; “remember therefore from where you have fallen; repent, and do the works you did at first” (Rev. 2:5). The witness who would penetrate this generation must remain consumed by an internal fire that is contagious; for what is not burning cannot ignite anything else.

The Fourth Dimension: Purity

The fourth dimension is purity, and the metaphor moves from the engine and the furnace to the refiner’s crucible. Ancient metallurgists understood that gold and silver, in their raw state, are bound up with impurities; only intense heat will separate the precious from the worthless. As the metal liquefies, the dross rises to the surface and is skimmed away; and a long-standing teaching tradition holds that the refiner continued this process until he could see his own reflection in the molten surface. Malachi described the coming of the Lord in precisely these terms: “He is like a refiner’s fire and like fullers’ soap. He will sit as a refiner and purifier of silver, and he will purify the sons of Levi and refine them like gold and silver, and they will bring offerings in righteousness to the LORD” (Mal. 3:2–3).

The fire of the Holy Spirit performs this same refining work in the believer. It burns away the dross of selfish ambition, private compromise and concealed motives, until the believer’s character increasingly reflects the image of Christ Himself. This is no peripheral matter; it is the seal of credibility. In any court of law, the testimony of a witness whose character has been compromised is dismissed regardless of whether the facts of his account are true; credibility, once forfeited, cannot be reclaimed by argument. So also in the spiritual realm: a witness whose public proclamation is not backed by a private reality has nothing to offer that the world will receive. “Pursue peace with everyone, and the holiness without which no one will see the Lord” (Heb. 12:14). Purity is not optional decoration on the apostolic life; it is the substrate on which everything else stands or falls.

The Reversal of Sinai

These four dimensions, when held together, are not innovations introduced by the New Testament; they are the restoration of a connection that was severed at the foot of Mount Sinai. When God descended upon that mountain in fire, smoke and trumpet blast, His original intention was the establishment of a kingdom of priests and a holy nation, a people who would hear His voice directly, without mediator, without filter (Exod. 19:5–6). Yet when the people heard the thunder and saw the lightning, they drew back in terror; “you speak to us, and we will listen; but do not let God speak to us, lest we die” (Exod. 20:19). They chose mediated religion over immediate relationship; they preferred a man to stand between them and the voice of God; and that single choice shaped the next fifteen hundred years of Israel’s covenantal history.

The day of Pentecost was the divine reversal of that ancient refusal. When the fire came again, it did not descend upon a mountain that the people were forbidden to touch; it descended upon the people themselves, resting in cloven tongues upon each one of them (Acts 2:3). What Sinai had withheld at the people’s own request, Pentecost restored at the Father’s own initiative. The Holy Spirit, given without measure, was the mechanism God used to fulfil at last the original plan: direct, personal, unmediated access to His presence for every son and every daughter who would receive Him. “And it shall come to pass in the last days, says God, that I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh” (Acts 2:17).

This is why the New Testament refers to the Spirit using the Greek word koinōnia, “fellowship”, “communion”, “shared life”. “The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all” (2 Cor. 13:14). The Spirit is not an impersonal energy source to be tapped, nor a functional tool to be deployed; He is a Person, an intimate friend and partner, with whom the believer shares a continuous, conscious life. To know Him as koinōnia is to be released from the weight of religious obligation; what was once duty becomes shared activity, what was once striving becomes participation, what was once performance becomes presence.

The Mark of the Witness Sent to the Ends of the Earth

We return, then, to the place we began. The Gospels introduce Jesus as the One who baptises in the Holy Spirit and fire; and we have seen that this baptism produces four identifiable dimensions in the believer: power that demonstrates the kingdom, perception that pierces deception, passion that refuses to grow cold, and purity that establishes credibility. These four together constitute the witness that Christ promised would carry His name to the ends of the earth.

The modern world will not be won by religious theory, however accurate; it will not be drawn back to Christ by institutional refinement, however polished; and it will not be persuaded by argument alone, however eloquent. It will be confronted, and ultimately convinced, by ordinary people walking in the unordinary reality of Spirit and fire. When such believers appear in a generation, the kingdom is no longer a doctrine to be debated; it becomes a presence to be reckoned with. This is the mission Jesus explicitly declared; this is the inheritance the Gospels explicitly announce; and this is the church the Spirit is even now raising up in our time.

Let the prayer of every reader, then, be the prayer that the early disciples were commanded to wait for and refused to move without: that the fire would fall again, that the Spirit would come in fullness, and that the explicit mission of Jesus would become the unmistakable identity of His people in this hour.

Glenn Bleakney is the Founder of Awake Nations on the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, and Dallas Texa, USA. He is also the President of Sent College. Together with his wife Lynn, he leads Awake Nations Global Network and has ministered across more than forty nations. His writing centres on Kingdom theology, apostolic reformation, and the recovery of a Spirit-empowered church for this generation.

Listen to the Kingdom Reformation podcast with Glenn Bleakney.

Watch Awake Nations TV free, anytime.

Download the apps at awakenations.tv/apps.

Share Awake Nations

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

Share

His preference is that we would sense His leading, fully cooperate and move in the new direction. However, as is all too often the case, He must intervene in the affairs of our lives due to the fact that we are comfortable and entrenched in our present course of action. In this teaching, Glenn Bleakney shares the 3 Biblical ways God often uses to move us in a new direction.

Purchase the Book - https://a.co/d/3l6O6Hx

Watch the Video Below

Using the iconic “Mind the Gap” warning from the London Underground as a prophetic metaphor, Glenn explores the inconsistencies between kingdom values and institutional practices.

From platform-driven ministry culture to authentic community, from digital influence to genuine discipleship, this episode challenges leaders and believers alike to confront the spaces where vision and reality no longer align.

With practical insights and a call to reform, “Mind the Gap” invites listeners into a deeper conversation about restoring integrity, authenticity, and kingdom-centered community in the Church.

Leave a comment

Share Awake Nations

Dear friends,

Every disciple of Jesus needs to know how to read the Bible well.

That’s why I want to personally invite you to our next module of study at Sent College:

Hermeneutics — starting Thursday 28 May (5 consecutive Thursdays 6:00 pm AEST)

Hermeneutics is the art and discipline of interpreting Scripture faithfully. You’ll learn how to read the Bible in context, understand different biblical genres, avoid common errors, and apply God’s Word with confidence.

You’ll discover how to:

• Read passages in their proper context

• Understand narrative, prophecy, poetry, epistles, and apocalyptic literature

• Trace the storyline of Scripture from Genesis to Revelation

• Interpret the Bible with greater clarity and confidence

At Sent College, we combine strong biblical training with practical Kingdom formation. We’re not just raising theologians — we’re raising disciples and disciple-makers.

We strongly encourage you to enrol for credit.

Hermeneutics is best learned by doing. Completing the assessments will sharpen your ability to rightly handle Scripture while earning credit toward a recognised qualification with Sent College USA.

If assessments aren’t possible for you right now, you can still join as an audit student and receive the teaching, notes, recordings, and lifetime access.

Classes are live on Zoom every Thursday at 6pm AEST, with recordings available for flexible study.

👉 Enrol for credit here: https://buy.stripe.com/eVq9ATgoq8Q1eNx2utfAc0h
👉 Enrol as an audit student here: https://buy.stripe.com/dRm8wP8VY3vHaxh4CBfAc0g

Classes are live on Zoom every Thursday at 6pm Australian Eastern Standard Time (AEST).

If that time doesn’t suit your time zone, you can study via video at your own pace with 10 teaching videos and full notes to guide your learning.

Grace and peace,
Glenn Bleakney
President, Sent College
sentcollege.com

Share

Subscribe now

What have you missed?

You have missed the announcement that lies underneath forgiveness, beneath the gift of the Spirit, and beyond the promise of heaven. You have missed the truth that ought to have arrested you at the door the first time you walked into a church and never let you go: that you have been invited, that morning and every morning since, into the household of God.

The Apostle Paul puts the matter in language we have grown too accustomed to hearing:

“So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God” (Ephesians 2:19, ESV).

Members of the household of God. Not religious visitors. Not occasional attendees of a weekly assembly. Actual members of an actual household, with one Father, one inheritance, one name, and one table. The longer I meditate upon this passage, the more persuaded I become that family is not merely one ministry function among many in the life of the Church, but is in fact the very nature of the Church herself. Family is the Father’s chosen vehicle, the Father’s chosen culture, and the Father’s chosen strategy for the redemption of a fractured world. This is the heart of what the Lord has commissioned us to recover at Awake Nations.

I want to walk you through four convictions that anchor our house, drawn from Scripture and from the apostolic pattern of the New Testament:

1. Family is resourced from the Father.

2. Family is restored by Jesus.

3. Family is realised in the Church.

4. Family is what it will take to reach the nations.

1. FAMILY IS RESOURCED FROM THE FATHER

Before there was a man or a woman, before there was a marriage or a child, before there was so much as a creature on the wing or a fish in the sea, there was already a family.

This is not a sentimental flourish; it is the bedrock of Christian theology. In the eternal life of God, before the first syllable of Genesis 1:1 had been uttered, the Father was pouring Himself into the Son, the Son was returning Himself to the Father, and the Spirit was the love moving between them. Relationship is not something God does in His dealings with us; relationship is who God eternally is.

Classical theology has given us two precise terms for this mystery, and both repay careful attention. The first is aseity, from the Latin a se, meaning “from Himself,” and it refers to the utter self-existence of God. He is dependent upon nothing outside of Himself, He lacks nothing, He is not lonely, and He is complete within the eternal communion of His own triune being. The second term is perichoresis, a Greek word employed by the early Church Fathers to describe the way in which the three Persons of the Godhead mutually indwell one another, giving themselves to one another and making room for one another in an eternal exchange of love. Some have called this the divine dance — an unbroken communion of self-giving love within the Godhead itself.

When God spoke the universe into being, therefore, He was not creating family out of any deficiency in Himself; He was extending family out of the overflow of who He had always been. Human relationship and human family did not originate in Eden — they originated in the eternal life of the Father, and they were patterned after a communion older than time. This is precisely what Paul wishes us to grasp:

“For this reason I bow my knees before the Father, from whom every family in heaven and on earth is named” (Ephesians 3:14–15).

There is a striking wordplay in the Greek that the English translation cannot quite carry across. The word for father is patēr, and the word translated family is patria, which denotes a paternal lineage, a clan descended from a common father. Hear the connection: patēr yields patria. Every family, whether in heaven or upon the earth, takes its name and its essential identity from the Father.

What does this mean for you, reading this article today? It means that the deepest longing you have ever felt for belonging — for a table to sit at and a name to bear and people to call your own — is not a sentimental weakness or an immature attachment. It is a homing instinct. It is the patria recognising the patēr. You were not designed to be self-contained, and no amount of personal accomplishment or theological certainty will silence the ache, because the ache itself was placed within you by the One in whose image you were made.

Furthermore, it is no incidental detail that the very first command God issued to humanity was a family command:

“And God blessed them. And God said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it’” (Genesis 1:28).

From the very first chapter of the canonical Scriptures, God’s chosen instrument for the governance of His creation is family. His chosen vehicle for the multiplication of His image upon the earth is family. His chosen culture for the dominion mandate is family. Whatever else the Church may be tempted to become in a given generation — a movement, an organisation, a platform, a brand — if she is not first and fundamentally a family, she has departed from the original blueprint.

2. FAMILY IS RESTORED BY JESUS

There is a moment in Genesis 3 that we ought never to read too quickly.

The fruit has been eaten. The atmosphere of Eden has shifted. The Lord God is walking in the cool of the day, and for the first time in human history, the sound of His footsteps is not the sound of joy but the sound of dread. Adam hides himself among the trees with his wife beside him, because shame has entered the human story, and shame is doing what shame has done in every generation since: it is separating the child from the Father.

This is the wound from which the entire human race begins to wander. We are clothed, fed, frequently religious, sometimes brilliant, often noble in our intentions, and yet profoundly disconnected from the household of the One who made us. We carry the orphan ache into our marriages and into our ministries, into our private prayers and into our public performances, and we cannot quite name what we are looking for.

Yet hear the response of the Father even in the immediate aftermath of the fall. He does not abandon. He pursues. The very next thing He does in the narrative is to come looking for Adam in the garden, and from Genesis 3 onward the entire arc of redemptive history bears witness to a single divine determination: I will bring My children home.

This is precisely what Jesus came to accomplish, and the Apostle John captures the whole gospel in a single, weight-bearing sentence:

“But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God” (John 1:12).

Read that verse slowly and let its full implication settle upon you. The entire point of receiving Jesus, according to the inspired text, is to be made a child of God. He grants you the right of a son, the standing of a daughter, the seat of an heir, and every privilege that pertains to belonging within the Father’s house. Salvation, properly understood, is not merely a legal pardon granted from a distant courtroom; it is an adoption decree issued from the throne room of heaven, securing for you a permanent place at the family table.

Consider the Lord’s own words to those who had paid a high personal price to follow Him:

“Truly, I say to you, there is no one who has left house or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or lands, for my sake and for the gospel, who will not receive a hundredfold now in this time, houses and brothers and sisters and mothers and children and lands, with persecutions…” (Mark 10:29–30).

Observe carefully that Jesus does not merely promise houses and lands as compensation for what has been forfeited; He promises brothers and sisters and mothers and children. The implication is unmistakable: He has come to restore family. Whatever has happened to your biological family — however broken, however absent, however painful the rupture may have been — the family of God is being given to you in Christ, and that spiritual family takes precedence even over our natural ties.

This is what Jesus came to build. Not a religious institution. Not a moral improvement programme. A family, with Himself at the centre, the Father in heaven, and brothers and sisters gathered around a common table, in this present age and not merely in the age to come.

3. FAMILY IS REALISED IN THE CHURCH

Three thousand people came to faith in Jerusalem in a single afternoon, and what the apostles did next ought to astonish us more than it does.

They did not announce a follow-up conference. They did not launch a brand. They did not roll out a curriculum, rent a venue, design a logo, or schedule a leadership summit. With no building, no denomination, no infrastructure, and no precedent, they did something far more radical and far more durable than any of these.

They started a family.

“And they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers” (Acts 2:42).

The Greek word translated fellowship in this passage is koinōnia, a rich and weighty term that denotes shared life, common participation, and things genuinely held in common. Koinōnia is not the casual acquaintance of those who happen to attend the same weekly meeting; it is the deep and abiding mutuality of those who share a common life and a common Father. The Spirit on the Day of Pentecost did not gather an audience out of the crowd. He gathered a household, and that household devoted itself to one another, sharing meals, sharing resources, and moving from house to house in the most intimate proximity.

When the Apostle Paul later instructed his son in the faith Timothy concerning how the people of God ought to relate to one another within the assembly, the image he reached for was unmistakably the language of family:

“Do not rebuke an older man, but encourage him as you would a father. Treat younger men like brothers, older women like mothers, younger women like sisters, in all purity” (1 Timothy 5:1–2).

This is the operating system of the New Testament Church, and we ought not to soften it for modern sensibilities. Older men are to be honoured as fathers, younger men received as brothers, older women treated as mothers, and younger women regarded as sisters. This is not a poetic metaphor offered for the sake of warmth; it is the apostolic identity of the household of God, and it is to govern the way we behave toward one another within these walls.

We are called to be a family, not a franchise. We are called to honour one another, to protect one another, to confront one another in love when necessary, and to carry one another through the messy and unglamorous moments that constitute the substance of any real relationship. This is what we are believing for and contending for at Awake Nations: a house in which spiritual fathers and mothers truly parent, in which sons and daughters truly receive, and in which brothers and sisters genuinely walk together over the long obedience of a lifetime. Family is realised here. It is not merely something we preach from the platform on a Sunday; it is something we are summoned to live from Monday onward.

4. FAMILY REACHES THE NATIONS

I have stood in church gatherings in more than forty nations of the earth, and I will tell you what I have observed.

In the places where the Church has functioned as a building with a programme, the surrounding city has remained largely untouched. People have come and gone, sermons have been preached and forgotten, conferences have filled auditoriums and emptied them again, and the spiritual atmosphere over the region has stayed essentially what it was. But in the places where the Church has functioned as a family — with real fathers and real mothers, real sons and real daughters, walking through real life together — something quite different has happened. Marriages have been mended. Prodigals have come home. The fear of the Lord has begun to settle over neighbourhoods, and then over suburbs, and eventually over entire regions. Cities have begun to feel different in the spirit, and outsiders who could not articulate what they were sensing have nonetheless come walking through the doors looking for it.

This is not coincidence. This is covenant pattern. When the Church functions as the household God designed her to be, healing flows outward from her in ever-widening concentric circles, and that healing begins very close to home.

Family heals the orphan heart. Psalm 68:6 declares that “God settles the solitary in a home,” bringing those who are lonely and isolated into the warmth of a family. Then, having placed us within that family, the Father sends His Spirit into our hearts to teach us the very language of belonging:

“And because you are sons, God has sent the Spirit of his Son into our hearts, crying, ‘Abba! Father!’” (Galatians 4:6).

When you walk into a family that genuinely understands itself to be a family, something within the orphan heart begins to come undone. You cease performing for approval; you begin belonging by inheritance. You stop hiding behind religious masks; you begin to grow into the full stature of sonship that has always been your birthright in Christ. This is something that religion, with all its programmes and protocols and platforms, has never been able to accomplish. Family heals what religion never could.

And from this inner healing the work goes wider still: family heals cities, and family heals nations. The Old Testament closes upon a remarkable promise, immediately followed by four hundred years of prophetic silence:

“And he will turn the hearts of fathers to their children and the hearts of children to their fathers, lest I come and strike the land with a decree of utter destruction” (Malachi 4:6).

The principle articulated in this final word of the Old Testament is profound, and it ought not to be passed over lightly. When the generations are torn apart, the land itself comes under a curse; when the generations are reconciled to one another and bound together in covenant love, that curse is broken and the favour of God begins to rest upon a region. The transformation of a city, of a state, of a nation does not begin with a political programme or a media strategy; it begins with the restoration of family within the people of God in that region.

That is precisely what we are believing for on the Sunshine Coast. Marriages restored. Children walking with God. Prodigal sons and daughters coming home from the far country. The atmosphere of heaven settling over this coast in such a manifest way that the wider community begins to take notice. And from this coast, family reaching across this nation, and out to the nations of the earth, until the knowledge of the glory of the Lord covers the earth as the waters cover the sea.

COME HOME

So hear the call of the Father today.

The cross was never merely a transaction designed to secure your attendance at a weekly religious service. The cross was an adoption decree, signed in the blood of the Son, designed to bring you all the way home into the household of God. Right now, in the heart of every believer who has received Christ, the Spirit of His Son is crying out Abba, Father, summoning you into the full inheritance that belongs to you as a son or daughter of the King of Glory.

If you have been carrying the wearying weight of an orphan heart, today is the day to come home. The Father is not ashamed to call you His own, and there is a seat at the table that has been reserved for you from before the foundation of the world.

If you are a younger believer, I would urge you to find spiritual fathers and mothers within the house and to open your life to them. Receive the inheritance that the Lord has prepared for you in the older generation, for there is a generational deposit that cannot be downloaded from a podcast or absorbed from a book.

If you are a more mature believer in Christ, ask the Lord this very morning: Who am I parenting? Who am I pouring my life into? Who am I raising up to take what I have received and to carry it further than I ever could?

The Church is a family — resourced from the Father, restored by Jesus, realised in the Church, and reaching the nations in Jesus’ name.

Welcome home.

Glenn Bleakney is the Founder of Awake Nations, a church and ministry network based on the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia. He is the author of Living in the Kingdom: Experience Supernatural Power and Provision and has ministered across more than forty nations. He and his wife Lynn lead Awake Nations Church and serve the nations through Sent College and the Awake Nations global network.

Leave a comment

In a culture shaped by speed, performance, and constant consumption, leadership can easily drift into producing activity without producing maturity. We can fill calendars, create programs, and expand platforms while still struggling to cultivate deeply rooted disciples who carry the character of Christ.

This framework exists to address that tension.

What follows is not a corporate leadership pipeline or a ministry growth strategy. It is a relational pathway for spiritual formation and healthy leadership development. It reflects a way of thinking about discipleship that values process over pressure, formation over performance, and family over functionality.

At Awake Nations, we believe leadership should emerge from transformed lives, not merely natural gifting. Healthy leaders are not manufactured through hurried promotion or isolated achievement. They are formed over time through community, accountability, character development, and faithful obedience to God.

The five dimensions outlined in this document provide a framework for recognizing and nurturing sustainable Kingdom growth. These dimensions are not rigid stages to complete, but overlapping areas of formation that unfold organically within the life of the house.

For leaders, this creates clarity.

It helps establish a culture where people are not merely recruited into roles but discipled into maturity. It protects against prematurely placing weight on individuals before character has been strengthened. And it creates an environment where leadership development becomes relational, intentional, and deeply pastoral.

Ultimately, this is about building people who can carry responsibility without losing their soul, sustain influence without collapsing under it, and walk faithfully with Jesus for the long haul.

Because the goal is not simply to raise leaders.

It is to form Christ in people.

Read more

Dear friends,

Every disciple of Jesus needs to know how to read the Bible well. Not just preachers. Not just teachers. Every believer who hungers to know God through His Word needs the tools to study Scripture for all its value and truth.

That is why I want to personally invite you into our next unit of study at Sent College.

Unit: Hermeneutics. Starting Thursday 28 May, running five weeks.

Hermeneutics is the discipline of interpreting the Bible faithfully. It teaches you to read with attention to genre, context, covenant, and the unfolding storyline of Scripture. It is the difference between guessing at the Bible and handling it with skill. Whether you are a long-time believer or new to serious study of the Word, hermeneutics will change the way you open your Bible.

You will learn to:

• Read every passage in its proper context

• Recognise and interpret different biblical genres (narrative, poetry, prophecy, epistle, apocalyptic)

• Trace the unfolding storyline of Scripture from Genesis to Revelation

• Avoid common interpretive mistakes that lead believers astray

• Apply the Word to your life and ministry with confidence

This is foundational. Every disciple needs it.

And there is more coming

Immediately following Hermeneutics, we will be opening our next module: Homiletics (Preaching and Teaching). If you are wanting to grow in any form of public speaking, whether teaching a small group, leading a Bible study, preaching from a pulpit, or sharing the Word in any setting, you will want to take both units. Hermeneutics teaches you how to understand the text. Homiletics teaches you how to deliver it. The two belong together.

But Hermeneutics comes first, and rightly so. You cannot preach or teach faithfully what you have not learned to interpret faithfully.

More details on Homiletics will follow. For now, the door is open on Hermeneutics, and that is where you want to step in.

Why Sent College is different

Most Bible colleges produce theologians. We are producing disciples and disciple makers.

Our teaching is academically rigorous and AQF aligned, but it never stays in the head. Every unit pushes you toward formation, mission, and the practical outworking of the Kingdom in your life and ministry. Our faculty are practitioners, not just lecturers. We are apostolic in DNA, Kingdom focused in content, and committed to raising up sons and daughters who carry the presence and power of God into every sphere.

You will not just learn about the Bible. You will be formed by it.

Our strong recommendation: enrol for credit

We highly recommend you enrol for credit and complete the assessments. With a unit like Hermeneutics, this is especially important.

Hermeneutics is a craft. You do not learn it by listening to someone else interpret Scripture. You learn it by interpreting Scripture yourself, submitting your work for feedback, and refining your approach over time. The assessments are designed to put the tools into your hands. You will exegete real passages, wrestle with genre and context, build interpretive arguments, and receive coaching from faculty who will sharpen your thinking.

Without that, you may understand hermeneutics as a concept but never develop it as a skill.

Alongside the formation, you will earn credit toward a recognised qualification with Sent College USA: Associate Degree of Ministry, Bachelor of Theology, Bachelor of Ministry, or Master of Divinity. That credit travels with you into every future unit and qualification, including the Homiletics module coming next.

This is the pathway we want for you. Choose the credit option.

Audit is a fallback

If life simply will not allow you to take on assessments in this season, the audit pathway is available as a fallback. You will still receive the teaching, the videos, the notes, and lifetime access. But you will not complete the assessments, you will not be coached on your own exegesis, and no qualification will be granted.

Use this option only if the credit pathway is genuinely beyond your reach right now.

How it works

Classes run live on Zoom every Thursday at 6 pm AEST. If that time does not suit, you can study at your own pace by watching the recorded videos. Notes are provided. Lifetime access to the videos comes with your enrolment.

A special thank you to paid subscribers

Our tuition is already incredibly affordable, because we are committed to making serious theological training accessible to disciples in every nation. But if you are a paid subscriber of this Substack, we want to honour your partnership with us.

Paid subscribers receive a 10% discount off tuition. Simply reply to this email before you enrol and we will send you the discounted enrolment link.

This is our small way of saying thank you for standing with the mission.

Enrol now

Recommended pathway. Enrol for credit here. Complete the assessments and earn credit toward your Sent College USA qualification: Associate Degree of Ministry, Bachelor of Theology, Bachelor of Ministry, or Master of Divinity.

Fallback pathway. Enrol as an audit student here. Same videos, same notes, lifetime access. No assessments. No coaching on your work. No qualification granted.

Please note: Once we receive your payment, we will be in touch with everything you need: learner guide, Zoom link, video access, and more.

Do not delay. 28 May is just over two weeks away. Step in, learn to handle the Word with skill, and get ready for what comes next.

Grace and peace,

Glenn Bleakney President, Sent College sentcollege.com

Thinking about church structure: after focusing on the fivefold ministry, where do the teachings about elders and deacons fit?

It is a fair question, and an important one, because the way we answer it shapes the way we build. The two are not in competition. They are not two systems fighting for the same space. But they are not the same thing either.

Here is the short answer. Historically and exegetically, elders are not part of the fivefold ministry. They are a different category altogether. The fivefold are Christ’s ascension gifts to the wider body. Elders and deacons are local church offices. Different axes. Different mandates. Designed to interlock.

Let me show you why that matters.

The Fivefold Are Gifts, Not Offices

Ephesians 4:11 is the foundational text. Paul writes that when Christ ascended, He led captivity captive and gave gifts to men. Then he names them.

And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers, for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ. (Ephesians 4:11–12, NKJV)

The Greek construction here is critical. Paul does not say Christ gave the office of apostle. He says Christ gave apostles. The persons themselves are the gift. Edōken tous men apostolous, tous de prophētas. He gave some as apostles, some as prophets, some as evangelists, some as pastors and teachers. The Greek for pastor here is poimēn, which literally means shepherd. I will use both terms interchangeably in what follows.

These are not local job titles. They are persons-as-gifts to the wider body. Their orientation is largely translocal. They move. They equip. They release. They build up the body across regions and networks until the church reaches the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ (Ephesians 4:13).

The fivefold are functional and charismatic gifts, given to mature the saints and bring the church to fullness. Their work is formation, mission and the building up of the body across cities and nations.

Elders and Deacons Are a Different Category

Now look at how elders are introduced in the New Testament. The vocabulary is different. The structure is different. The mandate is different.

Elders, presbyteroi, are a local church office. They are appointed by laying on of hands within particular congregations. They have stated qualifications, listed in detail in 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1. They are recognised, set in place and held accountable in a defined community.

Every church Paul planted was handed to a plurality of elders. Never a single leader. The texts are unambiguous.

So when they had appointed elders in every church, and prayed with fasting, they commended them to the Lord in whom they had believed. (Acts 14:23, NKJV)

For this reason I left you in Crete, that you should set in order the things that are lacking, and appoint elders in every city as I commanded you. (Titus 1:5, NKJV)

The elders who are among you I exhort, I who am a fellow elder and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and also a partaker of the glory that will be revealed: Shepherd the flock of God which is among you, serving as overseers. (1 Peter 5:1–2, NKJV)

Notice the language. Elders in every church. Elders in every city. The elders who are among you. Plural. Local. Resident. Their function is to govern, oversee and shepherd a specific community of believers. It is care, oversight and the day-to-day spiritual government of a particular household of faith.

The diaconal pattern is foreshadowed in Acts 6, where the Twelve set apart seven men to handle practical service so the apostles could give themselves continually to prayer and the ministry of the word. The noun diakonos is not yet used there, but the verb diakonein is, and the function is the seedbed of what will become the deacon office. Paul addresses elders and deacons together as the local office holders in Philippians 1:1 and lists their qualifications in 1 Timothy 3.

This is the local government and care structure of the church. It is not translocal. It is not equipping in the Ephesians 4 sense. It is shepherding, overseeing and serving a real congregation in a real place.

A Timeline of the Two Structures

Sometimes it helps to lay it out chronologically. Here is the development of the local office structure across the New Testament and the first four centuries of the church.

Biblical period

c. 33 AD, Acts 6 Seven men are set apart in Jerusalem to oversee the daily distribution to widows. The diaconal prototype is born as the Twelve give themselves to prayer and the ministry of the word.

c. 46–47 AD, Acts 11:30 Famine relief is sent from Antioch to Jerusalem and delivered “to the elders” by Barnabas and Saul. Elders are already functioning in the Jerusalem church.

c. 47–48 AD, Acts 14:23 Paul and Barnabas appoint elders “in every church” on the first missionary journey. The pattern of plural local eldership in Pauline churches is established.

c. 49–50 AD, Acts 15 The Jerusalem Council. “The apostles and elders” deliberate together. Translocal apostolic ministry and local elder leadership sit side by side, each carrying its own function.

c. 57 AD, Acts 20:17, 28 Paul calls the Ephesian elders to Miletus. He charges them to “shepherd the flock of God” and describes them as “overseers.” Elder, overseer and shepherding language are bound together in one office.

c. 60–62 AD, Philippians 1:1 Paul greets “the saints in Christ Jesus who are in Philippi, with the bishops and deacons.” Both offices, plural, named together as the local leadership.

c. 63–64 AD, 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1 Paul writes formal qualifications for both overseers and deacons. The local office structure is now fully articulated in writing.

c. 64–65 AD, 1 Peter 5:1–2 Peter exhorts “the elders who are among you” to shepherd the flock and serve as overseers. The Petrine churches mirror the Pauline pattern.

Sub-apostolic and early church

c. 95–96 AD, 1 Clement Clement of Rome writes to Corinth, defending the apostolic appointment of bishops and deacons. The two offices remain plural and local.

c. 80–110 AD, The Didache This early church manual carefully distinguishes between travelling apostles, prophets and teachers on the one hand, and locally appointed bishops and deacons on the other. Two structures, coexisting, designed to interlock.

c. 107 AD, Ignatius of Antioch Writing en route to martyrdom in Rome, Ignatius advocates for a single bishop above the presbyters and deacons. This is the first major shift away from plural eldership and toward what scholars call the monarchical episcopate.

c. 180 AD, Irenaeus Bishops and presbyters are now treated as a settled hierarchical order across the major sees. The Ephesians 4 equipping ministries are increasingly absorbed into the office of bishop.

c. 313 AD, Edict of Milan Constantine legalises Christianity. The church is rapidly institutionalised. What remained of the translocal apostolic and prophetic ministries is largely subsumed into the developing clerical hierarchy.

c. 451 AD, Council of Chalcedon A five-tier hierarchy is formally entrenched: patriarch, metropolitan, bishop, presbyter and deacon. The original apostolic architecture, with translocal equipping ministries above local elder teams, has now been lost for centuries.

The trajectory is clear. In the apostolic period, the two structures sit side by side. In the second century, the conflation begins. By the post-Constantinian period, the fivefold has effectively been folded into a single ascending clerical ladder. The recovery we are now seeing in the global church is a return to the original two-tier architecture.

The Overlap and the Strongest Counter-Argument

Now there are two places where the categories touch. It is worth handling them carefully because this is where most of the confusion lies.

Where the vocabulary overlaps

The pastor or shepherd, poimēn, in Ephesians 4:11 shares vocabulary with the shepherding language used of elders in Acts 20 and 1 Peter 5.

Therefore take heed to yourselves and to all the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God which He purchased with His own blood. (Acts 20:28, NKJV)

Shepherd the flock of God which is among you, serving as overseers. (1 Peter 5:2, NKJV)

So some elders carry a shepherding gift, in the Ephesians 4 sense, alongside their local office. Some elders also carry a teaching gift in that sense. This is why Paul tells Timothy that elders who labour in the word and doctrine are worthy of double honour (1 Timothy 5:17). The categories overlap at this point. Real people in real congregations carry both.

But the categories are not identical. The fivefold gift is broader than the local office. Not every elder is a fivefold shepherd, and not every fivefold shepherd is a local elder. A man may carry an Ephesians 4 shepherding gift and travel across regions equipping other shepherds, never sitting on a local elder team. Another may serve faithfully as a local elder for forty years without functioning in any translocal equipping capacity. Both are needed. Neither replaces the other.

Peter the apostle calls himself a fellow elder

But the strongest counter-argument is sharper than this. Someone will rightly ask, what about Peter?

The elders who are among you I exhort, I who am a fellow elder and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and also a partaker of the glory that will be revealed: Shepherd the flock of God which is among you, serving as overseers. (1 Peter 5:1–2, NKJV)

The key word is sympresbyteros, “fellow elder.” Peter, the chief apostle of the Jerusalem church, calls himself a fellow elder. So the categories cannot be as cleanly separated as the framework suggests. Either elders and apostles are the same thing, or the framework needs more nuance.

I think the framework holds, but it needs more nuance. Let me show you where.

Three things Peter is not saying. He is not saying that all elders are apostles. There were thousands of elders across the early church and only a small number of apostles. He is not saying that apostle is just another word for elder. If he meant that, he would not need to reach for sympresbyteros; he could simply say “as elders, I exhort you.” The very fact that he uses the sym prefix suggests he is identifying with a group he is not automatically part of by virtue of being an apostle. And he is not saying that the office of elder absorbs the function of apostle. He is still functioning apostolically in this letter. He is writing translocally to scattered believers across five Roman provinces (1 Peter 1:1). He is exercising authority over communities he did not personally found. He is grounding his exhortation in apostolic witness, “a witness of the sufferings of Christ.” That is apostolic ministry in operation, not local eldership.

So what is Peter doing?

He is using presbyteros in its broad sense. The Greek word has a wider semantic range than just “local church elder.” It can mean an older man, a respected senior in any community, a formally recognised local elder, or a senior leader in the wider apostolic community. The “elders” who appear alongside the apostles at the Jerusalem Council in Acts 15 are not just the local Jerusalem elder team. They are the senior leadership of the mother church, recognised seniors in the apostolic community.

He is exercising apostolic ministry pastorally. Peter could have written, “I, an apostle of Jesus Christ, command you elders.” He has the standing for that. Instead he writes, “I, a fellow elder, exhort you elders.” This is apostolic ministry exercised through identification rather than positional authority. It is the same instinct Paul shows in 1 Corinthians 4:15 when he reminds the Corinthians that he is their father in the gospel. It is the same posture in 1 Thessalonians 2:7, comparing himself to a nursing mother. The translocal apostolic ministry is being expressed through deeply local, deeply pastoral relational language.

He is modelling the inverse of Diotrephes. Read 3 John 9–10. Diotrephes is the local leader who “loves to have the preeminence” and refuses to receive the apostle John’s emissaries. He is what happens when an elder weaponises local position against translocal ministry. Peter is showing the inverse posture. The chief apostle steps down into the company of the elders, calls them brothers, and exhorts them from within. The apostle does not lord it over the elders. He walks with them as a fellow shepherd while remaining what Christ has given him to be.

This actually strengthens the framework rather than weakening it. Peter shows that an apostle can identify with elders, walk alongside elders, and exhort elders as one who knows the work of shepherding from the inside, without ceasing to be an apostle. The categories are distinct, but they are not sealed off from one another. A true apostle carries shepherding within him. A true shepherd carries something of the apostolic burden. Peter is demonstrating the overlap, not collapsing the distinction.

The same is true of James. He is described as functioning apostolically in Galatians 1:19, and he is clearly leading the Jerusalem church locally as the senior figure among its elders. He carries both at once in the same geographic location. He is the rare figure who holds local eldership and apostolic recognition simultaneously, but the eldership is the office, and the apostolic recognition is a gift acknowledged by the wider body. They coexist in him without collapsing into a single category.

If anything, Peter’s sympresbyteros is one of the strongest correctives in the New Testament against the kind of apostolic triumphalism that turns the gift into a hierarchical office. The chief apostle of the Jerusalem church, the one to whom the keys of the kingdom were entrusted, calls himself a fellow elder. That is the texture of true apostolic ministry. Not above the elders. Among them. With them. Equipping them. Loving them.

The chief apostle of the Jerusalem church calls himself a fellow elder. That is the texture of true apostolic ministry.

The remainder of this article is for paid subscribers. If you have benefited from my work and want to support it, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Paid subscribers receive deeper theological and pastoral content, full access to the Awake Nations archive, and the forthcoming series on apostolic architecture and the recovery of the fivefold in the present hour.

A Word About the Word “Office”

This brings us to a fair semantic question. Some will rightly push back at this point and say that the distinction between gift and office is just semantics. Any role of leadership is an office in the ordinary sense of the word. There is some truth to that, and I want to be honest about it.

Read more

Maybe it is someone who has hurt you and the wound is still too fresh to look past. Maybe it is a family member whose pattern of failure has worn you thin. Maybe it is a colleague you have already filed away under a label, or a person at church who frustrates you every time they open their mouth. Maybe it is someone in your own house.

We all carry a quiet gallery of people we have stopped expecting anything from. We are not cruel about it. We have just made our assessment and moved on.

But there is a way of seeing that is not native to us, and Paul tells us where it comes from.

Now hope does not disappoint, because the love of God has been poured out in our hearts by the Holy Spirit who was given to us. (Romans 5:5, NKJV)

The word Paul uses here for “poured out” is ekcheo in the Greek.

It is the same word used of the blood of the martyrs. The same word used of the Spirit’s outpouring at Pentecost. It describes something that floods and overflows beyond the boundaries of containment. Paul is not describing a gentle trickle of divine warmth. He is describing the love of God breaking its banks inside the human heart.

And when the love of God floods a human heart, something changes. Not just how we feel, but how we see.

A Love We Could Never Produce

The love Paul is describing is not a stronger version of human affection. It is not the love of a parent for a child amplified, or the love of a friend for a friend purified, or the love of a spouse made more patient. It is another kind of love altogether, and it does not arise from us. Paul is careful with his grammar in Romans 5:5. The love is poured out, passive voice, by the Holy Spirit, who was given to us. The agency is entirely God’s. The love does not bubble up from our better nature. It is deposited from outside us, by a Person, into the place inside us where only God can reach.

This is what makes it supernatural in the strict sense. It is not a feeling we work up. It is not the fruit of disciplined kindness. It is agape, the love that has its origin in God Himself, and the only way it enters a human heart is by the Holy Spirit carrying it there.

There is something most people miss about this love. Human love is almost always response love. We see something attractive, worthy, or useful, and our love rises to meet it. We love what is already lovely. Agape runs in the opposite direction. It does not love what is already valuable. It places value on what it loves. The Father did not love us because we were lovely. We become lovely because He loves us. Agape is the only love in the universe that creates worth rather than detecting it. And when the Spirit pours that love into your heart, He is not just giving you warmer feelings. He is giving you a love that can confer worth on people who have none in their own eyes, and none in anyone else’s.

Human love, even at its best, has limits built into it. We love those who love us back. We love those who behave in ways we recognise as worthy of love. We love until we are betrayed, until the cost gets too high, and then we begin to ration. Our love is conditional almost by reflex, even when we are trying our hardest not to make it so. We are finite, and our love is finite with us.

The love the Spirit pours in does not work this way. It loved us when we were still enemies, as Paul says four verses later in Romans 5. It loves the unlovely without first negotiating terms. It does not weaken under the weight of someone else’s failure. It does not measure what it gives against what it receives. It loves the way the Father loves, because it is the Father’s own love placed inside us by the Spirit who knows the depths of God.

This is why you cannot teach yourself to love your enemies, your difficult relatives, the person who wounded you. The flesh has no category for that kind of love. It can manage politeness. It can manage forgiveness as a duty. It cannot generate the seeking, building love the Father has for the people who broke His heart. Only the Spirit can put that love in you, and He does, freshly, every time you ask Him to pour it out again.

A Different Way of Seeing

Paul tells us in 2 Corinthians 5:16 that because of Christ we no longer regard anyone kata sarka, according to the flesh. That way of seeing catalogues only what is visible: a person’s history, their failures, their present state, their reputation. It evaluates by what is, not by what God has determined.

But when the love of God has been poured into us, we begin to carry another gaze entirely. The Spirit sees a person’s destination while the flesh can only see the departure point.

This is not naivety. It is not soft sentimentality that excuses sin or ignores reality. It is a fierceness of love that refuses to reduce a person to their worst moment. It sees them through the blood of Jesus and in light of the call of God on their life.

The Father’s Gaze

When Jesus looked at impulsive, unreliable Simon and called him Peter, a rock, He was not describing what He saw in the natural. He was speaking what the Father had already determined. That is what love-shaped seeing produces. Not flattery. Not wishful thinking. The Father’s own verdict spoken over a life.

Think of the prodigal’s father. While the son was still a great way off, the father saw him, recognised him, and ran. The father’s eyes were already trained on the horizon long before the son’s repentance brought him into view. That is the gaze love produces in a heart. It is watching for the return before there is any sign of it. It is recognising the child in the rags. It is running while others are still calculating whether the boy deserves to be received.

When Jesus looked at the woman at the well, He did not see the five husbands first. He saw a worshipper waiting to be uncovered. When He looked at Zacchaeus in the tree, He did not see the corrupt taxman first. He saw a son of Abraham who needed to come down so salvation could come to his house. The flesh would have started with the failure. Love starts with the future.

You Cannot Manufacture This

You cannot work this kind of seeing up by effort. You cannot decide to be more positive about people and produce it. The eyes of love are the overflow of a heart that has been flooded.

This is why Paul prays in Ephesians 3 that we would be rooted and grounded in love and would know the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge. He is not describing a doctrinal lesson. He is describing a saturation. The more deeply the love of God settles into the soil of a human heart, the more naturally it begins to spill out through the eyes.

A heart that has not received love sees through suspicion. A heart that has been filled with love sees through the lens of what the Father is building.

Pray for the ekcheo again. Not as a memory of something that happened at conversion. As a present, daily, repeated flooding. The Spirit who was given to us has not run dry. He is still poured out. And every fresh outpouring changes what we are able to see in the people around us.

Prayer

Father, flood me again. Pour out Your love in my heart by the Holy Spirit, not as a memory of something that happened once, but as a present and living reality. Let it overflow into the way I see the people around me today.

Give me the eyes of Jesus. Eyes that see past the surface, past the failure, past the present state, into the gold of what You are building. Let me carry Your gaze.

Amen.

Going Deeper Today

Think of one person in your life who is hard to see beyond their present struggle or failure. Ask the Holy Spirit to show you what the Father sees when He looks at them. What is He building? What has He already determined? Carry that picture with you today, and let it shape how you speak, how you respond, and how you pray.

Word Study

Ekcheo (Greek): to pour out, to flood, to overflow. Used in Acts 2:17 of the Spirit’s outpouring, and in Romans 5:5 of the love of God. Not a gentle drip. An overflow.

Agape (Greek): the love of God. Worth knowing: this word was relatively colourless in classical Greek. Eros and philiawere the prestigious words for love. The early church did not borrow a famous Greek word for the love of God. They took a quiet, available one and poured a meaning into it the Greeks had never imagined a love could hold. The word we use today still carries the fingerprint of that revolution.

Kata sarka (Greek): according to the flesh. The way of seeing Paul renounces in 2 Corinthians 5:16. It evaluates a person by what is visible and present rather than by what God has determined.

If this devotional ministered to you, consider sharing it with someone who needs new eyes for the people in front of them.

Glenn Bleakney writes at Awake Nations, exploring the Gospel of the Kingdom, the supernatural life of the Spirit, and what it means to live as the awakened church.

Share

Share Awake Nations

Leave a comment

It will remember those who burned.

Every great move of God was carried by people who had been so undone in His presence that staying silent was no longer an option. Not cautious people. Not calculating people. People who had been wrecked by God and could not go back to normal life afterward.

Whitefield preached to coal miners until the tears made white streaks through the grime on their faces. Evan Roberts knelt in Wales until heaven opened over a nation. William Seymour sat with his head in a wooden crate and prayed in the dark until Azusa Street changed the world.

They were not remarkable men.

They were simply awake.

The Church in this generation is sleeping.

Not everywhere. But broadly, comfortably, systemically — sleeping.

We swapped the altar for the auditorium somewhere along the way. We traded travailing prayer for production value. We built impressive things and called them revival, and God has not been fooled for a moment.

The restlessness you feel right now is not anxiety. That is the Spirit pressing on a generation. That is the same disruption that preceded every genuine awakening in history. God is moving again, and the question has never been whether He is willing.

The question is whether we are willing to be broken open.

Kairos moments do not wait.

They arrive. They press. They require a response. And when a generation keeps deferring, the moment eventually passes — and what remains is the quiet, awful awareness that something was available and we chose our comfort over it.

That is where we are standing right now.

The nations are in upheaval. Every man-made solution is visibly failing. The shaking is not incidental — God is exposing what cannot hold. And in the middle of it, He is looking for a Church that is actually awake, actually grounded, actually prepared to carry something real to a world that is desperate even if it does not know it yet.

The revivalists who went before us paid a price most of us have not been willing to touch.

They fasted while we feast. They wept while we run conferences. They pressed into God for years before anything broke open, while we quietly disband prayer meetings that don’t gain traction after a few weeks.

They carried a burden for souls that cost them sleep, health, reputation, and sometimes their lives.

If they could see this generation — the platforms, the reach, the resources, the tools — they would not be impressed.

They would be heartbroken that we are doing so little with so much.

The word for this moment is not strategy. It is desperation.

Not polished desperation. Not performed urgency from a stage.

Actual desperation. The kind that gets you out of bed before sunrise because the weight of what God is calling you into won’t let you rest. The kind that makes you genuinely indifferent to crowd size because you’re only asking one question: did God show up? The kind that makes the preacher preach like something is at stake, because something is.

People in our cities are not waiting for better content.

They are waiting for someone who actually believes what they’re saying.

You are not in this generation by accident.

This moment was not assigned to someone else. You are not a spectator to what God is doing. The harvest in your city, your street, your sphere of influence is not theoretical — it is real, it is ready, and it will not wait indefinitely.

God did not fill you with His Spirit so you could manage a respectable Christian life at a safe distance from the fire.

He put you here to burn.

So wake up. Pick up the burden. Pay the price.

The hour is later than we think.

Glenn Bleakney | Awake Nations

Every time God builds something that lasts, He starts underground.

Joseph in the prison. David in the cave. Jesus in thirty years of obscurity before three years of ministry. The depth of what He builds beneath the surface determines the weight of what He builds above it.

For a year, that is exactly what we have been doing at Awake Nations. Building underground. Forming a people before forming a platform. Praying. Discipling. Forming culture that nobody saw, because the foundation mattered more than the launch — and that kind of foundation is not laid in a week.

What we celebrate publicly was built privately. And now what God has been doing in secret is becoming visible.

This is not a church plant in the conventional sense. It is the public unveiling of a movement that we believe carries something the hour requires.

People are not rejecting Jesus. They are rejecting powerless religion. And in many cases it is not even rejection — they have simply never seen the authentic on display.

So we are going back. Back to Jesus in the Gospels. Back to the nascent Church in Acts. Back to a people who did not just believe a message, but carried a Presence. Who did not just attend gatherings, but shook cities. Who did not just talk about the Kingdom, but demonstrated it.

That is the Christianity the world has barely seen. And that is the Christianity we are being called to recover.

What we are building

Awake Nations is being built around five marks. These are not five values we pick and choose between. They are not five departments on an organisational chart. They are one integrated life — the life of a Church that actually resembles Jesus.

We are not pretending we can manufacture this. We are not naive enough to think that vision statements produce transformation, or that strategy alone builds a Church carrying the weight of heaven. What we are describing is beyond us. It always has been. So we stand here not boasting, but dependent. Open-handed. Asking God for the grace to become what only He can build.

One. The Lordship of Christ

“Therefore let all Israel be assured of this: God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Messiah.” — Acts 2:36

This is the first apostolic sermon. Pentecost. The Spirit has just been poured out, three thousand are about to be saved, and the climax of Peter’s message is not “Jesus loves you” or “Jesus wants to help you.” It is this — God has made Jesus both Lord and Christ. Kyrios and Christos. Sovereign King and Anointed Messiah.

That single line shaped the entire identity of the early Church. They did not preach Jesus as a self-help guru or a personal life coach. They preached Him as enthroned. As ruling. As the one to whom every knee will bow. The response Peter calls for is not “invite Him into your heart.” It is repent. Turn around. Realign your entire life under the rule of the new King.

The early Church did not go to prison and to the lions because they confessed Jesus as Saviour. They died because they confessed Him as Lord, and Caesar was not. That confession was political, economic, social, and personal upheaval all at once. To say “Jesus is Lord” was to dethrone every other lord competing for the throne of your life.

This is where the modern Church has lost its edge. We have made Jesus a Saviour without making Him a Lord. We have offered people forgiveness without surrender. Heaven without obedience. A relationship without authority. And we have produced a generation of believers who have prayed a prayer but never bowed a knee.

Lordship is not a one-time decision. It is a daily yielding. It is the question every morning — Lord, what are You saying? Where are You going? What are You asking me to release? What are You asking me to obey? It is the willingness to do it even when it costs you, even when it is inconvenient, even when no one else is watching.

This kind of Church does not manufacture obedience through control or guilt or pressure. We have all seen that, and it produces nothing but wounded people. Real Lordship is built on trust. We obey because we trust His leadership. We trust His heart. We trust His timing. We trust that what He is asking us to release is never as valuable as what He is preparing us to receive.

Where Lordship is real, repentance is normal, not rare. Confession is not crisis management; it is a daily rhythm. Obedience is not reluctant compliance; it is joyful alignment with the rightful King.

This is the foundation of everything else we are building. Without it, every other mark loses its centre.

Two. A Dwelling Place for God

“In him you too are being built together to become a dwelling in which God lives by his Spirit.” — Ephesians 2:22

This is one of the most staggering claims in the New Testament. Paul looks at this gathered company of redeemed believers — Jews and Gentiles, slaves and free, broken and being healed — and he calls them a temple. Not a place where God visits. A place where God lives. A dwelling. A habitation. Stones being fitted together by the Spirit Himself into a sanctuary that houses the Glory.

That language is not metaphor. It is reality.

Under the Old Covenant, the Glory descended on a tent in the wilderness. Then on a temple in Jerusalem. Then it departed when the people drifted. But under the New Covenant, the Glory has come to rest somewhere new. Not a building. Not a mountain. Not a city. A people. Filled with His Spirit. Indwelt by Christ. Made together into the dwelling place of God on earth.

This changes everything about how we understand the Church. We are not gathering to invite God into a room. He already lives in us. We are not performing rituals to summon a Presence we hope might show up. The Presence of God has taken up permanent residence in His people. The question is never will God come. The question is whether we are awake to who already lives in us.

But here is the sober truth: a dwelling place can be honoured or it can be defiled. Paul warned the Corinthians, do you not know that you yourselves are God’s temple, and that God’s Spirit dwells in your midst? And then he said, if anyone destroys God’s temple, God will destroy that person. The temple is sacred. What lives there must be honoured. The way we live, the way we speak, the way we treat one another, the way we steward our bodies and our gatherings — all of it either honours the One who dwells in us or grieves Him.

This is why we cannot settle for symbolic Christianity. We are not a club that meets weekly to discuss spiritual things. We are a temple. Filled with Glory. Built together stone by stone by the Master Builder Himself, into something He intends to inhabit and to display through.

When the Church understands this, everything shifts. Worship stops being a warm-up and becomes the response of a temple to the One who fills it. Prayer stops being a routine and becomes the conversation of a people who are intimately indwelt. Holiness stops being a burden and becomes the natural posture of a sanctuary that knows what lives within it. Healing, deliverance, breakthrough — these are not visiting phenomena. They are the natural overflow of a dwelling place where the King has made His home.

This is what the world has barely seen. Not religion that talks about God, but a people in whom God lives. And when they walk into a workplace, a hospital, a marketplace, a city, they do not carry an idea. They carry a Presence. Because they are the place where He dwells.

Three. Formed in Christ

“My dear children, for whom I am again in the pains of childbirth until Christ is formed in you.” — Galatians 4:19

Read that verse slowly. Paul did not say until you understand more theology. He did not say until you attend more meetings. He said until Christ is formed in you. Formation. Christ’s character, Christ’s mind, Christ’s love, Christ’s holiness, Christ’s wisdom — being shaped inside the believer until what comes out of them is recognisably Him.

That is the goal of Christian discipleship. Not information transfer. Transformation. Not data. Becoming.

And Paul uses the language of childbirth — labour pains. He is not describing a programme. He is describing travail. The kind of spiritual investment that grows people slowly and painfully into the likeness of Jesus. That is what real discipleship costs. And that is what the modern Church has almost entirely outsourced.

With all our sermons and podcasts and conferences and books, we have produced some of the most informed and least formed believers in history. People who can quote Scripture but cannot forgive. People who can debate doctrine but cannot disciple their own children. People who can lead a small group but cannot tell you what God has changed in their character in the last twelve months.

Information without formation produces hypocrites. Knowledge without transformation produces Pharisees. And Jesus reserved His sharpest words for exactly that kind of religion.

Formation happens slowly. It happens in relationship. It happens in accountability. It happens in long obedience in the same direction. It happens when truth meets life, and when life is exposed to truth in a community that will not let you stay where you are.

That is why we do not just teach at Awake Nations. We disciple. The Circle, our monthly discipleship gathering. The Inner Circle, our gender-specific accountability groups. Sent College, our theological training arm. These are not programmes. They are the ground in which formation happens. Where people are known. Where people are challenged. Where character is shaped over years, not events.

The fruit of formation is not a smarter believer. It is a believer who looks more like Jesus this year than they did last year. Whose marriage is healthier. Whose temper is more under the Spirit. Whose generosity has grown. Whose love has deepened. Whose holiness is more instinctive.

That is what we are giving ourselves to.

Four. Carrying His Kingdom

“But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you; and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.” — Acts 1:8

Jesus did not leave us a mission statement. He left us the mission. And He did not give it to a special class of professional Christians. He gave it to everyone who carries His Spirit.

Every believer is a witness. Every believer is sent. Every believer carries the Kingdom into territory that has not yet seen it. Your workplace is mission territory. Your street is mission territory. Your school, your gym, your industry, your family line — all of it is ground the Kingdom is meant to advance into through you.

We have spent decades outsourcing the mission. We have sent it to missionaries. We have handed it to pastors. We have left it to the evangelism team. The result is a Church where most believers have never personally led someone to Jesus, and most cannot remember the last time they shared their faith outside a church building.

But the early Church was not like that. They did not have buildings, budgets, or platforms. They had the Holy Spirit and a sentness, and within a generation they had turned the Roman Empire upside down. They did not have an outreach event. They were the outreach. Every dinner table. Every marketplace. Every prison cell. Every conversation.

Carrying the Kingdom is not an event. It is a posture. It is seeing your daily life as deployment. It is recognising that wherever your feet go, you carry authority. You carry Presence. You carry good news. You carry healing. You carry the keys.

It also disrupts the way we use our resources. Generosity becomes a weapon. Money stops being something we hoard for our own comfort and starts being seed we sow into Kingdom ground. Time stops being something we spend on ourselves and becomes something we invest in eternity.

A people who live sent do not need to be guilted into evangelism. It flows out of who they are. Because once you really see the Kingdom, you cannot keep it to yourself.

This is why Awake Nations is not, and never will be, a movement for the Sunshine Coast alone. The mandate has always been the nations. We are equipping a people who are sent — into their workplaces, their cities, their nations, and the ends of the earth.

Five. Authentic Family

“By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” — John 13:35

This is the verse that should haunt us. Jesus did not say the world will recognise His disciples by their doctrine. By their music. By their buildings. By their political alignment. By their numerical growth. He said they will recognise us by love — the kind of love that exists between us.

Family is the apologetic of the gospel.

The early Church did not grow primarily because of preaching. It grew because the watching world looked at this strange new community and saw something they had never seen before. Slaves and masters at the same table. Jews and Gentiles eating together. Rich and poor sharing what they had. Widows cared for. Orphans adopted. Enemies forgiven. People dying for one another. The pagan world had no category for it, and they were drawn to it like moths to fire.

We have lost this. Most modern churches are not families. They are crowds. People come, they consume, they leave, and they are never truly known. Their struggles stay hidden. Their wounds stay buried. Their gifts stay dormant. They sit in rows for years next to people whose names they do not even know. And we have called this Church. It is not. It is a religious audience.

Authentic family is the cure. Family means people are known, not hidden. It means conflict is handled with honour, not gossip. It means shared lives beyond Sundays — eating together, praying together, raising kids in proximity to each other, weeping together, celebrating together, carrying each other through real seasons of joy and pain.

It also means accountability. Real family does not just affirm you. It corrects you. It calls you up. It refuses to let you stay stuck. It loves you too much to leave you where you are. That is why we have structured the Inner Circle the way we have — gender-separated, accountable, formative — because the kind of belonging Jesus calls us into is both safe and sharpening.

Family without Lordship becomes dysfunction. Family without Formation becomes a social club. But Family rooted in Christ is the most beautiful, most powerful, most evangelistically irresistible thing on earth.

One Integrated Life

These five marks are not a menu. They are not five departments. They are not five values you pick and choose between. They are one integrated life — the life of a Church that actually resembles Jesus.

Lordship without Presence becomes dry religion. Presence without Formation becomes unstable spirituality. Formation without Mission turns inward. Mission without Family burns people out. Family without Lordship becomes dysfunction.

You need all five. Woven together. Held in tension. Lived consistently. Not performed for a season, but cultivated for a lifetime.

The real question is not whether these matter. The real question is this: will we build around them, or just admire them?

Because if these become the culture — not just the language on a wall — you do not just get a healthy church. You get a people who carry authority. Host the Glory. Walk in maturity. Live sent. And actually love one another.

That is what the world is starving to see.

Set Apart for What’s Next

Before any of this becomes real, there is one more thing I have to say. And it is the heart of why we are standing here at this moment.

Have you ever noticed that God rarely moves suddenly without first calling people to prepare?

All through Scripture, before the breakthrough, there was consecration.

At Mount Sinai, before His Presence came down, God said “consecrate yourselves.”

Before crossing into the Promised Land, Joshua said “consecrate yourselves, for tomorrow the Lord will do wonders among you.”

When God established the priesthood, Aaron and his sons were consecrated. Because you cannot carry holy things casually.

And when the nation drifted, Joel cried out, “consecrate a fast.” Because consecration is not just preparation. It is also the pathway back.

Here is the pattern. Before encounter. Before breakthrough. Before calling — there is consecration.

This is not about rituals. It is about alignment.

Consecration today is choosing God over distraction. Purity over compromise. Presence over performance. Because you cannot step into what God has next while holding onto what He is asking you to release.

Consecration makes room. It clears space. It sharpens your hearing. And just like then, it positions you for what God is about to do.

So perhaps the real question is not where is God. Perhaps the question is — are we prepared for Him to move?

What God has been building underground for the last year is ready to come above ground. The foundation is laid. The people are being formed. The five marks are not just values. They are who we are becoming.

And we are not asking God to bless what we have built. We are consecrating what we have built so He can use it.

How the movement is taking shape

Awake Nations is expressed through several integrated streams.

Awake Nations Church is our local expression on the Sunshine Coast. Sunday gatherings, The Circle as our monthly discipleship gathering, and The Inner Circle as our gender-specific accountability groups. This is the laboratory where everything else is tested in real life.

Sent College is our theological training arm, registered in both Texas and Australia, offering pathways from Certificate of Ministry through to Master of Divinity. Sent College equips emerging and established leaders with rigorous biblical training shaped by Kingdom theology, apostolic and prophetic ministry, and the practice of formation. Cohorts run on the Sunshine Coast and online for students in the nations.

Awake Nations Global Network is a relational network of churches, ministries, and leaders across the nations who carry similar convictions. Not a denomination. Not a brand. A covenantal family of leaders sharing resources, accountability, and friendship across borders.

Awake Nations Publishing — through this Substack, our YouTube channel, and the books and curriculum we produce — puts language and resources into the hands of leaders building in their own contexts.

Who we are looking for

We are not looking for a crowd. We are looking for partners. The kind of people who do not need to be convinced that something needs to change, because they already feel it. The kind of leaders who are tired of noise and ready for substance. The kind of believers who would rather be formed than impressed.

Specifically, we are reaching out to four kinds of friends in this season.

Local believers on the Sunshine Coast and surrounding regions who are looking for a church family where presence, formation, and mission are taken seriously.

Pastors and church leaders, in Australia and internationally, who sense alignment with what we are building and want to explore relationship, partnership, or network membership.

Emerging leaders, ministers, and students who want serious theological training that is also alive in the Spirit, through Sent College.

Apostolic, prophetic, and intercessory friends in the nations who want to walk together with us in prayer, partnership, and mutual sending.

How to connect

If anything in this resonates, we would genuinely love to hear from you. Awake Nations is being built on relationship, not transaction, and the most important step is simply a conversation.

Local home base: Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia Sunday gatherings: Awake Nations Church The Circle:Monthly discipleship gathering, third Sunday Sent College: Theological training, Sunshine Coast and online Network enquiries: For pastors, leaders, and ministries in the nations

Whether you are local to the Sunshine Coast, anywhere in Australia, or in the nations, we welcome the conversation. Reply to this post, comment below, or reach out through our church and college contact pages.

We are not asking anyone to follow us. We are asking whether you would walk with us, in whatever way the Spirit leads, as together we give ourselves to what God is doing in this hour.

Awake Nations. This is what we are set apart for. This is what is next.

Glenn Bleakney is the Founder of Awake Nations Church on the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, and the President of Sent College.

Leave a comment

The church in much of the Western world has drifted. We’ve traded the apostolic for the institutional, the prophetic for the professional, and the presence of God for polished production. We’ve built empires around personalities, handed discipleship over to programmes, and confused numerical growth with Kingdom advance. The fivefold ministry has been flattened; the saints have been spectated rather than equipped. And in too many places, the mission has been reduced to keeping people comfortable and the doors open.

But the cost of that drift is not abstract. It is measured in the faces of people who came to the church hungry and left empty. It is measured in the generations who walked away not because they rejected Jesus but because what they encountered in his name bore so little resemblance to the Jesus of the Gospels that they could not reconcile the two. It is measured in believers who sat in pews for decades, never once equipped or released or called into anything beyond passive consumption. It is measured in leaders who burned out carrying a model that was never meant to rest on one person’s shoulders. The drift has a human cost; and that cost is one the Western church has largely refused to reckon with honestly.

These things are not in need of a gentle course correction. They represent a systemic departure from the New Testament pattern and they need to be torn down and rebuilt. I will say that loudly, repeatedly, and without apology from every platform I’m given.

But here’s where I part ways with a certain stream of reformers.

The moment someone begins throwing mud on the bride of Christ, I’m out. Reformation is not ridicule; correction is not contempt. There is a spirit that masquerades as prophetic boldness but is really just unresolved offence dressed in reformation language. I’ve seen it. It tears down without building; it diagnoses without love. It gathers an audience by stoking cynicism toward the very body Jesus died for.

That’s not reformation; that’s demolition dressed in doctrine.

To the church at Ephesus Jesus said something that should stop every reformer in their tracks. He commended them for their doctrinal precision, their intolerance of false teaching, their tireless labour, their refusal to compromise. By every external measure they were doing everything right. And then he said:

I have this against you, that you have abandoned the love you had at first. — Revelation 2:4

Not that they had abandoned the truth. Not that they had softened their convictions. They had simply lost love. And Jesus called it a fall. He told them to repent.

This is worth sitting with. Ephesus was not a liberal church. It was not a compromised church. It was theologically rigorous, missionally active, and doctrinally sound. It had tested false apostles and found them wanting. It had endured hardship without growing weary. By the standards of most reformation discourse today, Ephesus would have been held up as a model. And yet Jesus looked at all of that and said: you have fallen. The absence of love was not a minor shortcoming to be noted and moved on from. It was a categorical failure that required repentance and a return to first works.

That is a sobering word for anyone who has built a platform on the failures of the church. You can be right about everything and still be in the condition Jesus is warning against. Doctrinal precision without love is not reformation; it is just a more sophisticated version of what Ephesus had become. And Jesus is no more impressed by it today than he was then.

It is entirely possible to be theologically correct about everything that is wrong with the church and still be in the same condition as Ephesus. Right about the diagnosis; wrong in the spirit. Accurate in the critique; absent in the love. That combination is not reformation. It is just Ephesus with a podcast.

The Spirit of the Reformer Matters

There is a type of Christian voice that has grown loud in our day. It speaks the language of reformation; it identifies real problems, names real failures, and calls for real change. So far, so good. But somewhere along the way the diagnosis curdles into contempt. The church is not just broken, she is beyond repair; the institution is not just flawed, it is the enemy. And the person speaking has subtly repositioned themselves outside the body, gathering an audience not around a vision of what the church could become but around a shared disdain for what she currently is.

That is not the spirit of a reformer; that is the spirit of a critic who has given up.

The apostle Paul is the most compelling example in all of Scripture of what it looks like to hold fierce prophetic critique and deep pastoral love in the same hand.

His letters to Corinth alone should settle the question. This was a church riddled with division, sexual immorality, doctrinal confusion, abuse of the Lord’s table, and a charismatic culture that had become more about self-display than edification. Paul named every one of those things without flinching. He did not soften the diagnosis to protect people’s feelings; he did not avoid the hard conversations to preserve his popularity. He said what needed to be said with surgical precision and apostolic authority.

And yet underneath every word of correction was a love that is almost overwhelming in its intensity. He called them his joy and his crown (Philippians 4:1). He wrote that out of much affliction and anguish of heart he wrote to them with many tears, not to cause them pain but to let them know the abundant love he had for them (2 Corinthians 2:4). He described the daily pressure on him of his anxiety for all the churches (2 Corinthians 11:28). He was not detached; he was not above them. He was broken for them.

That is the model. Not a critic who has built a platform on the failures of the church; a father who is in anguish over the gap between what his children are and what they are called to be, and who refuses to stop fighting for them.

In the twentieth century, a South African Pentecostal named David du Plessis did something that cost him almost everything in his own community. Rather than writing off the mainline denominations as dead and beyond hope, he walked into them. He sat with Catholics; he engaged with Lutherans and Anglicans and Presbyterians. He brought the fire of the Spirit into rooms that had not seen it in generations, and he did it not with contempt for what those traditions were but with love for what they could become.

His own Pentecostal community was not always kind about it. He was criticised for giving credibility to compromised institutions; he was accused of being naive at best and compromised at worst. He lost his ministerial credentials with the Assemblies of God for a period because of his ecumenical engagement.

He kept going anyway. Not because he was blind to the failures of the institutional church; he saw them clearly. But he carried a conviction that you cannot write off what Jesus has not written off, and that love for the broader body is not weakness. It is obedience.

He became known as Mr Pentecost. Not because he separated himself from the compromised and gathered the pure; but because he loved the whole church enough to bring her what she was missing.

That brokenness is entirely different from the cynicism that drives so much online reformation discourse today.

Brokenness builds. Cynicism burns.

New Movements Are Necessary. Contempt Is Not.

Let me say something that might surprise you given everything above. I believe new movements are necessary. I believe God raises up new wineskins because old ones sometimes cannot contain what the Spirit is doing. I have given my life to one. I make no apology for that.

The issue is never whether something new is needed. The issue is the spirit in which it is born.

There is a vast difference between a movement that emerges from a burden and a movement that emerges from bitterness. One is pulled forward by a vision of what the church could become; the other is pushed forward by disgust at what she currently is. Jesus noted in the parable of the wheat and tares that the two can look identical in the early stages of growth. The difference only becomes apparent as they mature. A burden and a bitterness can wear the same face in the beginning; the difference only becomes clear over time in the fruit they bear and the collateral damage they leave behind.

New movements born from genuine apostolic burden tend to honour what God has done in previous generations even while pressing beyond it. They plant without poisoning; they build without burning down what others have built. They carry a spirit of sonship toward the broader body even when they are doing something the broader body does not yet understand or recognise.

Movements born from bitterness do the opposite. They define themselves primarily by what they are against; their identity is constructed around the failures of the institutional church rather than the fullness of the Kingdom vision they are pursuing. And that root of bitterness, however justified it feels in the beginning, defiles everything it touches.

See to it that no root of bitterness springs up and causes trouble, and by it many become defiled. — Hebrews 12:15

You can leave a church without despising her; you can plant something new without smashing what already exists. You can carry a reformation mandate without carrying an offence. The question is not whether you build something new. The question is what is in your heart when you do.

She Is Still the Bride

Step back from the institution for a moment. Step back from the arguments and the frustrations and the very real failures that have been named in this article. And look at what Jesus sees when he looks at the church.

He sees his bride.

Not the idealised, cleaned-up version of her. Not the triumphant, spotless version she will one day be at his return. This version. The version that exists right now in all her messiness and inconsistency and occasional embarrassment. The version that has made mistakes and failed people and built things that needed to be rebuilt. The version that has sometimes looked more like the world than the Kingdom.

He loves her anyway. Deeply, fiercely, unwaveringly. He gave everything for her. Not as a transaction but as an act of love so total that Paul reaches for the language of marriage to even begin to describe it. Husbands, love your wives as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her (Ephesians 5:25). He is right now interceding for her at the right hand of the Father. He is sanctifying her; He is cleansing her; He is preparing her for the day when she will stand before him without spot or wrinkle or any such thing. He has not written her off. He has not decided she is too far gone. He has not given up on her, and neither will I.

If that is how Jesus sees the church then the question every reformer must answer is this: how dare we see her differently? How dare we speak of her with contempt when he speaks of her with love? How dare we gather audiences around our disdain for her when he gave his life for her?

You cannot claim to love the Head while despising the body; you cannot declare allegiance to the Father while treating His family as something to be discarded or sneered at. Paul understood that; Du Plessis understood that. The great cloud of witnesses who loved the church at great personal cost understood that. We need to recover it.

So Where Does That Leave Us?

It leaves us with a high and difficult calling. To see clearly without becoming cynical; to speak boldly without becoming cruel. To contend for change without losing love for the thing we are contending for.

Yes, I will push for change. I will name what needs to be named. I will contend for the apostolic, the prophetic, the fullness of what the Spirit is restoring in this hour. I will not soften the critique where critique is needed.

But I will do it on my knees. With tears if necessary. As someone who loves what Jesus loves.

Reform must be done in the right spirit or it isn’t reform at all. It’s just another wound on the body.

If you want to keep thinking through these things together, here is where that conversation continues. Subscribe to Awake Nations on Substack for reformation without cynicism, apostolic thinking rooted in love for the church, and content that takes both the Word and church history seriously. This is not a spectator space. It’s for those who are building.

[Subscribe to Awake Nations]

Refer a friend

Leave a comment

—a verse we often quote, but rarely fully grasp. This message explores Psalm 37:4 beyond surface-level faith, revealing that delighting in God isn’t transactional but transformational.

As you pursue Him, your desires begin to shift, your heart aligns with His, and favour grows in your life.

Real breakthrough doesn’t come from chasing promises, but from cultivating intimacy with Him.

If you’ve felt dry or distant, this is an invitation back—because delight isn’t just something you do, it’s something you become.

Share Awake Nations Ministries

Leave a comment